ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019
Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03316703 (Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures - Conventional Open Surgery Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures - Conventional Open Surgery Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgery: A Randomized Trial.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- Percutaneous versus traditional open approaches for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures in patients without neurologic deficits: a meta-analysis of 35 cohort studies.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Application of AUSS-TLIF for the treatment of a lumbar burst fracture: A case report.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Article
- Clinical efficacy and safety of modified tracer fixation technique in robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Applications of the SpineJack device in the surgical management of type A4 lumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: illustrative cases.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2025Article
- Less Is More: Evaluating the Benefits of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Our C-Arm-Free Minimally Invasive Technique for Spinal Surgery: The Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Spine-Based on Our Experiences.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Finite element analysis of short and long posterior spinal instrumentation and fixation for different pathological thoracolumbar vertebral fractures.World neurosurgery: X · 2023Article
- Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization and decompression in AOSpine-type A3 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficit.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- The effect of expandable versus static lordotic interbody implants in minimally invasive spine surgery: patient reported outcomes, sagittal alignment, and restoration of disc height and foraminal height.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2023Article
- Pedicle screw fixation combined with posterior decompression and bone grafting for thoracolumbar spinal fractures can enhance curative effect and spinal cord function.American journal of translational research · 2022Article
- Treating surgical site infection following posterior instrumentation with free-style deepithelialized propeller flap: A case report.Joint diseases and related surgery · 2021Article
- The arthroscopic minimally-invasive technique improves the clinical symptoms and facilitates the functional recovery of the lower limbs in knee joint bone trauma patients.American journal of translational research · 2021Article
- [Minimally invasive stabilization of spinal fractures].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18-65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). DISCUSSION: Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up.
trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.