Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31472691›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2019

Open versus minimally invasive percutaneous surgery for surgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures- a multicenter randomized controlled trial: study protocol.

Helton L A Defino, Herton R T Costa, Altacílio A Nunes, Marcello Nogueira Barbosa, Valéria Romero

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03316703 (Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures - Conventional Open Surgery Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03316703 naunknown statusnot on this map

Surgical Treatment of the Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures - Conventional Open Surgery Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Surgery: A Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2018 to 2023Enrolled60ConditionsSpinal Fracture, Traumatic FractureArmsConventional open surgery, Minimally invasive percutaneous surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helton L A DefinoFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Herton R T CostaFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Altacílio A NunesFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Marcello Nogueira BarbosaFaculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil.
Valéria RomeroDepartment of Medical Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. emaildavaleria@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3278-5223
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracolumbar fractures are most frequent along the spine, and surgical treatment is indicated for unstable fractures. Percutaneous minimally invasive surgery was introduced to reduce the pain associated with the open posterior approach and reduce the morbidity of the procedure by avoiding damage and dissection of the paravertebral muscles. The goal of this study is to compare the surgical treatment of fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated by the conventional open approach and the percutaneous minimally invasive approach using similar types of pedicle spine fixation systems. METHODS/DESIGNS: This study is designed as a multi-center, randomized controlled trial of patients aged 18-65 years who are scheduled to undergo surgical posterior fixation. Treatment by the conventional open approach or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be randomly assigned. The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain, which will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS). The secondary outcome parameters are intraoperative bleeding, postoperative drainage, surgery time, length of hospital stay, SF-36, EQ-5D-5 l, HADS, pain medication, deambulation after surgery, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, vertebral segment kyphosis, fracture vertebral body height, compression of the vertebral canal, accuracy of the pedicle screws, and breakage or release of the implants. Patient will be followed up for 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months postoperatively and evaluated according to the outcomes using clinical and radiological examinations, plain radiographs and computed tomografy (CT). DISCUSSION: Surgical treatment of thoracolumbar fractures by the open or percutaneous minimally invasive approach will be compared in a multicenter randomized study using similar types of fixation systems, and the results will be evaluated according to clinical and radiological parameters at 1, 2, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months of follow-up.

trial registrationClinicalTrial.gov approval number: 1.933.631, code: NCT03316703 in may 2017.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFracture Fixation, InternalHumansLength of StayLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMulticenter Studies as TopicOpen Fracture ReductionOperative TimeBoneFracturesMini-open surgeryPedicle screwSpinal injuriesSpine

Identifiers

PMID31472691
PMCPMC6717640
OpenAlexW2971338423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.