ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019
Dynamic re-weighting of acoustic and contextual cues in spoken word recognition.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phonetic stability predicts individual differences in acoustic-phonetic cue weighting.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Listeners near-optimally integrate acoustic and semantic cues in spoken word recognition: Evidence from experiments manipulating cue order and reliability.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Language exposure, input diversity and receptive vocabulary affect stop and vowel perception in Spanish-dominant Spanish-English bilingual children.Child development · 2026Article
- Maintenance of subcategorical information during speech perception: revisiting misunderstood limitations.Journal of memory and language · 2025Article
- Individual differences in the use of top-down versus bottom-up cues to resolve phonetic ambiguity.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Spectral degradation and carrier sentences increase age-related temporal processing deficits in a cue-specific manner.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Article
- Do They Know It's Christmash? Lexical Knowledge Directly Impacts Speech Perception.Cognitive science · 2024Article
- Resolving competing predictions in speech: How qualitatively different cues and cue reliability contribute to phoneme identification.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2024Article
- Erratum: Dynamic re-weighting of acoustic and contextual cues in spoken word recognition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 146(2), EL135-EL140 (2019)].The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Rational speech comprehension: Interaction between predictability, acoustic signal, and noise.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Mishearing as a Side Effect of Rational Language Comprehension in Noise.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Listeners integrate acoustic and contextual cues during word recognition. However, experiments investigating this integration disrupt natural cue correlations. It was investigated whether changes in correlational structure affect listeners' relative cue weightings. Two groups of participants engaged in a word recognition task. In one group, acoustic (voice onset time) and contextual (lexical bias) cues followed natural correlations; in the other, cues were uncorrelated. When cues were correlated, cue weights were stable throughout the experiment; when cues were uncorrelated, contextual cues were down-weighted. Listeners thus can re-weight cues based on their statistical structure. Studies failing to account for re-weighting risk over/under-estimating cue importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.