Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31472562›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019

The effect of target/masker fundamental frequency contour similarity on masked-speech recognition.

Lauren Calandruccio, Peter A Wasiuk, Emily Buss, Lori J Leibold, Jessica Kong, Ann Holmes, Jacob Oleson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recognition of Speech With Dynamic Pitch Manipulation in Noise: Effects of Manipulation Methods.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  5. Maturation of Speech-in-Speech Recognition for Whispered and Voiced Speech.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022
    Article
  6. Revisiting the target-masker linguistic similarity hypothesis.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Does Sentence-Level Coarticulation Affect Speech Recognition in Noise or a Speech Masker?Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lauren CalandruccioDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Peter A WasiukDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Emily BussDepartment of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA.
Lori J LeiboldBoys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.
Jessica KongDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Ann HolmesDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, USA.
Jacob OlesonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52246, USA.

Funding

Speech-on-speech masking and hearing impairment: Factors affecting variabilityR03DC015074 · NIDCD · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI CALANDRUCCIO, LAUREN · 2016 to 2018
$476k
NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC015074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Greater informational masking is observed when the target and masker speech are more perceptually similar. Fundamental frequency (f0) contour, or the dynamic movement of f0, is thought to provide cues for segregating target speech presented in a speech masker. Most of the data demonstrating this effect have been collected using digitally modified stimuli. Less work has been done exploring the role of f0 contour for speech-in-speech recognition when all of the stimuli have been produced naturally. The goal of this project was to explore the importance of target and masker f0 contour similarity by manipulating the speaking style of talkers producing the target and masker speech streams. Sentence recognition thresholds were evaluated for target and masker speech that was produced with either flat, normal, or exaggerated speaking styles; performance was also measured in speech spectrum shaped noise and for conditions in which the stimuli were processed through an ideal-binary mask. Results confirmed that similarities in f0 contour depth elevated speech-in-speech recognition thresholds; however, when the target and masker had similar contour depths, targets with normal f0 contours were more resistant to masking than targets with flat or exaggerated contours. Differences in energetic masking across stimuli cannot account for these results.

Indexed as

Perceptual MaskingSpeech AcousticsSpeech PerceptionAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleSignal-To-Noise RatioVoiceYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31472562
PMCPMC6690832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.