ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2019
Effect of channel separation and interaural mismatch on fusion and lateralization in normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Binaural sensitivity and processing of envelope-based interaural difference cues by bilateral cochlear implant users with perilingual and postlingual onset of deafness.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Asymmetric temporal envelope encoding: Lateralization with varying envelope shape and spectral mismatch.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2025Article
- Binaural fusion: Complexities in definition and measurement.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2024Review
- Effect of interaural electrode insertion depth difference and independent band selection on sentence recognition in noise and spatial release from masking in simulated bilateral cochlear implant listening.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- Lateralization of interaural time differences with mixed rates of stimulation in bilateral cochlear implant listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Effects of spectral smearing on speech understanding and masking release in simulated bilateral cochlear implants.PloS one · 2023Article
- Asymmetric temporal envelope sensitivity: Within- and across-ear envelope comparisons in listeners with bilateral cochlear implants.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- Development of Sound Localization in Infants and Young Children with Cochlear Implants.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Longitudinal auditory data of children with prelingual single-sided deafness managed with early cochlear implantation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Interaural asymmetry of dynamic range: Abnormal fusion, bilateral interference, and shifts in attention.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Spatial Release From Masking in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients With Single-Sided Deafness.American journal of audiology · 2021Article
- Benefits of triple acoustic beamforming during speech-on-speech masking and sound localization for bilateral cochlear-implant users.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021Article
- Electro-Haptic Stimulation: A New Approach for Improving Cochlear-Implant Listening.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Review
- The Temporal Limits Encoder as a Sound Coding Strategy for Bilateral Cochlear Implants.IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing · 2021Article
- Review of Binaural Processing With Asymmetrical Hearing Outcomes in Patients With Bilateral Cochlear Implants.Trends in hearingReview
- A Comparison of Place-Pitch-Based Interaural Electrode Matching Methods for Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Users.Trends in hearingArticle
- Sound Localization Bias and Error in Bimodal Listeners Improve Instantaneously When the Device Delay Mismatch Is Reduced.Trends in hearingArticle
- Benefits of Bilateral Bone Conduction Device Use Including Osia Devices in Children and Adolescents With Bilateral Atresia.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bilateral cochlear implantation has provided access to some of the benefits of binaural hearing enjoyed by normal-hearing (NH) listeners. However, a gap in performance still exists between the two populations. Single-channel stimulation studies have shown that interaural place-of-stimulation mismatch (IPM) due to differences in implantation depth leads to decreased binaural fusion and lateralization of interaural time and level differences (ITDs and ILDs, respectively). While single-channel studies are informative, multi-channel stimulation is needed for good speech understanding with cochlear implants (CIs). Some multi-channel studies have shown that channel interaction due to current spread can affect ITD sensitivity. In this work, we studied the effect of IPM and channel spacing, along with their potential interaction, on binaural fusion and ITD/ILD lateralization. Experiments were conducted in adult NH listeners and CI listeners with a history of acoustic hearing. Results showed that IPM reduced the range of lateralization for ITDs but not ILDs. CI listeners were more likely to report a fused percept in the presence of IPM with multi-channel stimulation than NH listeners. However, no effect of channel spacing was found. These results suggest that IPM should be accounted for in clinical mapping practices in order to maximize bilateral CI benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.