Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31472028›Full record

Trial reportAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2019

Randomized Clinical Trial Examining Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Individuals With a First-Time DUI Offense.

Karen Chan Osilla, Susan M Paddock, Colleen M McCullough, Lisa Jonsson, Katherine E Watkins

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Social Networks of Clients in First-Time DUI Programs.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2020
    Trial
  5. Risk factors associated with driving under the influence of drugs in the USA.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karen Chan OsillaRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.ORCID 0000-0002-6222-5833
Susan M PaddockNORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Colleen M McCulloughRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Lisa JonssonRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Katherine E WatkinsRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
RAND Corporation · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

DELIVERING TREATMENT IN DUI PROGRAMS TO REDUCE ALCOHOL-RELATED DISPARITIESR01MD007762 · NIMHD · RAND CORPORATION · PI OSILLA, KAREN CHAN · 2014 to 2018
$2.2M
NIMHD NIH HHS R01 MD007762
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDriving under the influence (DUI) programs are a unique setting to reduce disparities in treatment access to those who may not otherwise access treatment. Providing evidence-based therapy in these programs may help prevent DUI recidivism.

methodsWe conducted a randomized clinical trial of 312 participants enrolled in 1 of 3 DUI programs in California. Participants were 21 and older with a first-time DUI offense who screened positive for at-risk drinking in the past year. Participants were randomly assigned to a 12-session manualized cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or usual care (UC) group and then surveyed 4 and 10 months later. We conducted intent-to-treat analyses to test the hypothesis that participants receiving CBT would report reduced impaired driving, alcohol consumption (drinks per week, abstinence, and binge drinking), and alcohol-related negative consequences. We also explored whether race/ethnicity and gender moderated CBT findings.

resultsParticipants were 72.3% male and 51.7% Hispanic, with an average age of 33.2 (SD = 12.4). Relative to UC, participants receiving CBT had lower odds of driving after drinking at the 4- and 10-month follow-ups compared to participants receiving UC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.37, p = 0.032, and OR = 0.29, p = 0.065, respectively). This intervention effect was more pronounced for females at 10-month follow-up. The remaining 4 outcomes did not significantly differ between UC versus CBT at 4- and 10-month follow-ups. Participants in both UC and CBT reported significant within-group reductions in 2 of 5 outcomes, binge drinking and alcohol-related consequences, at 10-month follow-up (p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn the short-term, individuals receiving CBT reported significantly lower rates of repeated DUI than individuals receiving UC, which may suggest that learning cognitive behavioral strategies to prevent impaired driving may be useful in achieving short-term reductions in impaired driving.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingAdultAlcohol AbstinenceAlcohol DrinkingAlcoholic IntoxicationBinge DrinkingCognitive Behavioral TherapyDriving Under the InfluenceEthnicityFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleSex FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment OutcomeAlcohol Use DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyDriving Under the InfluenceImpaired Driving

Identifiers

PMID31472028
PMCPMC6779493
OpenAlexW2971266888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.