Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471950›Full record

Trial reportJournal of applied clinical medical physics2019

Modeling Elekta VersaHD using the Varian Eclipse treatment planning system for photon beams: A single-institution experience.

You Zhang, Anh H Le, Zhen Tian, Zohaib Iqbal, Tsuicheng Chiu, Xuejun Gu, Andrei Pugachev, Robert Reynolds, Yang K Park, Mu-Han Lin and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Commissioning of a Versa HDJournal of applied clinical medical physics · 2021
    Article
  7. Boosting radiotherapy dose calculation accuracy with deep learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

You ZhangUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Anh H LeRoswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NK, USA.
Zhen TianWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Zohaib IqbalUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Tsuicheng ChiuUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Xuejun GuUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Andrei PugachevOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Robert ReynoldsUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Yang K ParkUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Mu-Han LinUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Strahinja StojadinovicUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Southwestern Medical CenterThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USEmory University · USOregon Health & Science University · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to report a single-institution experience and commissioning data for Elekta VersaHD linear accelerators (LINACs) for photon beams in the Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Two VersaHD LINACs equipped with 160-leaf collimators were commissioned. For each energy, the percent-depth-dose (PDD) curves, beam profiles, output factors, leaf transmission factors and dosimetric leaf gaps (DLGs) were acquired in accordance with the AAPM task group reports No. 45 and No. 106 and the vendor-supplied documents. The measured data were imported into Eclipse TPS to build a VersaHD beam model. The model was validated by creating treatment plans spanning over the full-spectrum of treatment sites and techniques used in our clinic. The quality assurance measurements were performed using MatriXX, ionization chamber, and radiochromic film. The DLG values were iteratively adjusted to optimize the agreement between planned and measured doses. Mobius, an independent LINAC logfile-based quality assurance tool, was also commissioned both for routine intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) QA and as a secondary check for the Eclipse VersaHD model. The Eclipse-generated VersaHD model was in excellent agreement with the measured PDD curves and beam profiles. The measured leaf transmission factors were less than 0.5% for all energies. The model validation study yielded absolute point dose agreement between ionization chamber measurements and Eclipse within ±4% for all cases. The comparison between Mobius and Eclipse, and between Mobius and ionization chamber measurements lead to absolute point dose agreement within ±5%. The corresponding 3D dose distributions evaluated with 3%global/2mm gamma criteria resulted in larger than 90% passing rates for all plans. The Eclipse TPS can model VersaHD LINACs with clinically acceptable accuracy. The model validation study and comparisons with Mobius demonstrated that the modeling of VersaHD in Eclipse necessitates further improvement to provide dosimetric accuracy on par with Varian LINACs.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPhantoms, ImagingPhotonsHumansNeoplasmsOrgans at RiskParticle AcceleratorsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedCommissioningEclipseElektaTreatment planning systemVarianVersaHD

Identifiers

PMID31471950
PMCPMC6806469
OpenAlexW2971132655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.