Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471818›Full record

ArticleJournal of nephrology2020

Pre-implantation kidney biopsy: value of the expertise in determining histological score and comparison with the whole organ on a series of discarded kidneys.

Ilaria Girolami, Giovanni Gambaro, Claudio Ghimenton, Serena Beccari, Anna Caliò, Matteo Brunelli, Luca Novelli, Ugo Boggi, Daniela Campani, Gianluigi Zaza and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nephrology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The Canadian Anatomic Kidney Score Assessment of reproducibility among surgeons and trainees across Canada.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Label-free viability assessment ofBiomedical optics express · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Only IF/TA in the Histological Evaluation of Post-Reperfusion Baseline Biopsies Correlates With Kidney Transplant Outcome.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ilaria GirolamiDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Giovanni GambaroRenal Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Claudio GhimentonDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Serena BeccariDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Anna CaliòDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Matteo BrunelliDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Luca NovelliInstitute for Histopathology and Molecular Diagnosis, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Ugo BoggiDivision of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Daniela CampaniDepartment of Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gianluigi ZazaRenal Unit, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Luigino BoschieroDepartment of Surgical Sciences, Kidney Transplant Center, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, Verona, Italy.
José Ignacio LópezDepartment of Pathology, Biocruces-Bizkaia Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
Guido MartignoniDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
Antonia D'ErricoPathology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Dorry SegevDepartment of Surgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Desley NeilDepartment of Histopathology, University Hospital Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Albino EccherDepartment of Pathology and Diagnostics, University and Hospital Trust of Verona, P.le Stefani n. 1, 37126, Verona, Italy. albino.eccher@aovr.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9992-5550

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence about the reliability of pre-implantation biopsy is still conflicting, depending on both biopsy type and pathologist's expertise. Aim of the study is to evaluate the agreement of general v specialist pathologists and to compare scores on biopsy and whole organs in a set of discarded kidneys.

methods46 discarded kidneys were identified with their corresponding biopsies. The biopsies were reviewed by three general and two specialist pathologists, blinded to the original report, according to Remuzzi score. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated for both groups. Discarded kidneys were scored according to Remuzzi score by a single specialist pathologist. Biopsies and organs were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Weighted κ coefficients between biopsy and organ scores were also calculated.

resultsSpecialist pathologists achieved higher values of ICC, reaching excellent or good agreement in most of the parameters, while general pathologists values were mainly fair or good. On whole organs, scores were consistently lower than biopsies, with a significant difference in most of the parameters. Weighted κ coefficient was slight or fair for most of the parameters.

conclusionsOur data suggests that the creation of a pool of specialist pathologists would improve organ utilization. Moreover, biopsies are not representative of the whole organ. As the Remuzzi score on biopsy is a major reasons for discard, a quota of transplantable kidneys may be erroneously discarded. Refinement in Remuzzi cut-offs based on expert reporting and recognition of sampling error of biopsies in correlation with clinical outcome data should be undertaken.

Indexed as

BiopsyDonor SelectionKidney TransplantationPathologySpecializationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsAgreementBiopsy scoreDonor biopsyPre-implantation biopsyTransplantation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.