Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471790›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2019

Receipt of brachytherapy is an independent predictor of survival in glioblastoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database.

Jiri Bartek, Ali A Alattar, Sanjay Dhawan, Jun Ma, Tomoyuki Koga, Peter Nakaji, Kathryn E Dusenbery, Clark C Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Radiation's formulations.Neuro-oncology · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiri BartekDepartment of Medicine and the Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Ali A AlattarFaculty of Health Sciences, UCSD, San Diego, USA.
Sanjay DhawanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Jun MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Tomoyuki KogaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Peter NakajiBarrow Brain and Spine, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Kathryn E DusenberyDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Clark C ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. ccchen@umn.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6258-9277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere has been a resurgence of interest in brachytherapy as a treatment for glioblastoma, with several currently ongoing clinical trials. To provide a foundation for the analysis of these trials, we analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine whether receipt of brachytherapy conveys a survival benefit independent of traditional prognostic factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe identified 60,456 glioblastoma patients, of whom 362 underwent brachytherapy. We grouped patients based on receipt of brachytherapy and compared clinical and demographic variables between groups using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. We assessed survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

resultsMedian overall survival was 16 months in patients who received brachytherapy compared to 9 months in those who did not (log-rank p < 0.001). Patients who underwent brachytherapy tended to be younger (p < 0.001), suffered from smaller tumors (< 4 cm, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone gross total resection (GTR, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox models, these variables were independently associated with improved overall survival. Additionally, improved survival was associated with known receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.459, p < 0.001), external beam radiation (HR 0.447, p < 0.001), and brachytherapy (HR 0.637, p < 0.001). The association between brachytherapy and improved survival remained robust (HR 0.859, p = 0.031) in a multivariable model that adjusted for patient age, tumor size, tumor location, GTR, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of external beam radiation.

conclusionOur SEER analysis indicates that brachytherapy is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma after controlling for age, tumor size/location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation.

Indexed as

Age FactorsBrachytherapyBrain NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSEER ProgramSurvival RateBrachytherapyGlioblastomaSurveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)Survival

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.