Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471786›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2020

Feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic adrenal tumors in selected patients: a retrospective multicenter study of Japanese populations.

Takayuki Goto, Takahiro Inoue, Takashi Kobayashi, Toshinari Yamasaki, Satoshi Ishitoya, Takehiko Segawa, Noriyuki Ito, Yasumasa Shichiri, Kazuhiro Okumura, Hiroshi Okuno and 9 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic factors after adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis.International urology and nephrology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Takayuki GotoDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6537-3068
Takahiro InoueDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Takashi KobayashiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Toshinari YamasakiDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Satoshi IshitoyaDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Otsu Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Takehiko SegawaDepartment of Urology, Kyoto City Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Noriyuki ItoDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Yasumasa ShichiriDepartment of Urology, Otsu City Hospital, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Kazuhiro OkumuraDepartment of Urology, Tenri Hospital, Nara, Japan.
Hiroshi OkunoDepartment of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Mutsushi KawakitaDepartment of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Toshio KanaokaDepartment of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Wakayama Medical Center, Wakayama, Japan.
Naoki TeradaDepartment of Urology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Shoichiro MukaiDepartment of Urology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Motohiko SugiDepartment of Urology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Hidefumi KinoshitaDepartment of Urology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Toshiyuki KamotoDepartment of Urology, University of Miyazaki Hospital, Miyazaki, Japan.
Tadashi MatsudaDepartment of Urology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
Osamu OgawaDepartment of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-Cho, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. ogawao@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Kyoto University · JPKansai Medical University · JPUniversity of Miyazaki Hospital · JPJapanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center · JPKobe City Medical Center General Hospital · JPKobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center · JPKyoto City Hospital · JPKyoto Medical Center · JPOtsu Municipal Hospital · JPOtsu Red Cross Hospital · JPTenri Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause of the small numbers of cases in single centers, the indications for and survival benefits of adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis remain unclear. We evaluated the outcomes of laparoscopic adrenalectomy for patients with adrenal metastasis.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed the records of 67 patients who underwent laparoscopic adrenalectomy for metastatic disease from 2003 to 2017 at 11 hospitals. Associations of clinical, surgical, and pathologic features with overall survival (OS) and positive surgical margins were evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and univariate logistic regression analysis.

resultsLung cancer (30%) and renal cell carcinoma (30%) were the most common primary tumor types. Intraoperative complications were observed in seven patients (10%) and postoperative complications in seven (10%). The surgical margin was positive in 10 patients (15%). The median OS was 3.8 years. Univariate analysis showed that the tumor size, episodes of extra-adrenal metastasis before adrenalectomy, extra-adrenal metastasis at the time of adrenalectomy, and positive surgical margins were significantly associated with shorter OS (p = 0.022, p = 0.005, p < 0.001, and p = 0.022, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that extra-adrenal metastasis at the time of adrenalectomy and positive surgical margins remained statistically significant (p = 0.022 and p = 0.049, respectively). In the univariate analysis, the tumor size was significantly associated with positive surgical margins (p = 0.039).

conclusionsLaparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal metastasis can be safely performed in selected patients, and patients with isolated adrenal metastasis and negative surgical margins seem to have more favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsAgedCarcinoma, Renal CellFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansJapanKidney NeoplasmsLaparoscopyLung NeoplasmsMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedPatient SelectionRetrospective StudiesAdrenalectomyLaparoscopyNeoplasm metastasis

Identifiers

PMID31471786
OpenAlexW2970198449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.