Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471781›Full record

ArticleAnimal cognition2019

Unpredictable environments enhance inhibitory control in pheasants.

Jayden O van Horik, Christine E Beardsworth, Philippa R Laker, Ellis J G Langley, Mark A Whiteside, Joah R Madden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal cognition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Inhibitory control tests in non-human animals: validity, reliability, and perspectives.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The lag-time constraint for behavioural plasticity.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Heritability and correlations among learning and inhibitory control traits.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jayden O van HorikCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK. jayden.van.horik@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8319-911X
Christine E BeardsworthCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Philippa R LakerCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Ellis J G LangleyCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Mark A WhitesideCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.
Joah R MaddenCentre for Research in Animal Behaviour, Washington Singer Laboratories, Psychology, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QG, UK.

Funding

European Research Council 616474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to control impulsive actions is an important executive function that is central to the self-regulation of behaviours and, in humans, can have important implications for mental and physical health. One key factor that promotes individual differences in inhibitory control (IC) is the predictability of environmental information experienced during development (i.e. reliability of resources and social trust). However, environmental predictability can also influence motivational and other cognitive abilities, which may therefore confound interpretations of the mechanisms underlying IC. We investigated the role of environmental predictability, food motivation and cognition on IC. We reared pheasant chicks, Phasianus colchicus, under standardised conditions, in which birds experienced environments that differed in their spatial predictability. We systematically manipulated spatial predictability during their first 8 weeks of life, by either moving partitions daily to random locations (unpredictable environment) or leaving them in fixed locations (predictable environment). We assessed motivation by presenting pheasants with two different foraging tasks that measured their dietary breadth and persistence to acquire inaccessible food rewards, as well as recording their latencies to acquire a freely available baseline worm positioned adjacent to each test apparatus, their body condition (mass/tarsus

Indexed as

GalliformesIndividualityAnimalsCognitionFemaleMaleMotivationReproducibility of ResultsExecutive functionImpulsivityResponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID31471781
PMCPMC6834925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.