Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471753›Full record

Trial reportEuropean radiology2020

Low-dose CT angiography using ASiR-V for potential living renal donors: a prospective analysis of image quality and diagnostic accuracy.

Woong Kyu Han, Joon Chae Na, Sung Yoon Park

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Dual-energy CT of acute bowel ischemia.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Woong Kyu HanDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon Chae NaDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sung Yoon ParkDepartment of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea. sungyoon.park@samsung.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0996-7595
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

a faculty grant of Research Institute of Radiological Science of Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 4-2017-0197
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess image quality and diagnostic accuracy of low-dose computed tomography (CT) angiography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V) for evaluating the anatomy of renal vasculature in potential living renal donors. MATERIALS AND

methodsEighty of 100 potential living renal donors were prospectively enrolled and underwent multiphase CT angiography (e.g., unenhanced, arterial, and venous phases) to evaluate the kidney for donation. Either low-dose using ASiR-V or standard protocol was randomly applied. Image quality was analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively with contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Renal artery and vein number, early branching vessel from renal arteries, and drainage of left-sided ascending lumbar vein to left renal vein were assessed. Reference standard for renal vasculature was surgical confirmation.

resultsSize-specific dose estimate of low-dose CT angiography (9.5 ± 0.8 mGy) was significantly lower than standard CT angiography (22.7 ± 4.1 mGy) (p < 0.001). Thus, radiation dose was reduced by 58.2% with low-dose CT. Both CNR and SNR of low-dose CT were significantly higher than those of standard CT (p < 0.001). Between the two CT methods, image quality was similar qualitatively (p > 0.05). Of 80 participants, 44 (55.0%) underwent nephrectomy. Both CT methods accurately predicted the anatomy of renal vasculature (standard CT, 100% for all variables; low-dose CT, 96.6% for renal vessel number or early branching vessel and 85.7% for drainage of left-sided ascending lumbar vein to left renal vein; p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

conclusionLow-dose CT angiography using ASiR-V is useful to evaluate renal vasculature for potential living renal donors. KEY POINTS: • In this prospective study, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction V (ASiR-V) allowed 58.2% dose reduction while maintaining diagnostic image quality for renal vessels. • As compared with the standard protocol, the dose with ASiR-V was significantly lower (9.5 ± 0.8 mGy) than with standard computed tomography (CT) angiography (22.7 ± 4.1 mGy). • Low-dose CT using ASiR-V is useful for living donor evaluation before nephrectomy.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationLiving DonorsAdolescentAdultAgedClinical ProtocolsComputed Tomography AngiographyFemaleHumansKidneyMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRadiation DosageRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadionuclide ImagingComputed tomographyKidneyNephrectomyRadiationTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID31471753
OpenAlexW2970681634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.