Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471678›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2019

The development of visually guided stepping.

Rachel Mowbray, Janna M Gottwald, Manfei Zhao, Anthony P Atkinson, Dorothy Cowie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rachel MowbrayDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. rachel.mowbray@durham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8429-0177
Janna M GottwaldDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5497-4001
Manfei ZhaoDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Anthony P AtkinsonDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2649-4569
Dorothy CowieDepartment of Psychology, Durham University, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2601-369X
Durham University · GBUppsala University · SE

Funding

Economic and Social Research Council ES/J500082/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adults use vision during stepping and walking to fine-tune foot placement. However, the developmental profile of visually guided stepping is unclear. We asked (1) whether children use online vision to fine-tune precise steps and (2) whether precision stepping develops as part of broader visuomotor development, alongside other fundamental motor skills like reaching. With 6-(N = 11), 7-(N = 11), 8-(N = 11)-year-olds and adults (N = 15), we manipulated visual input during steps and reaches. Using motion capture, we measured step and reach error, and postural stability. We expected (1) both steps and reaches would be visually guided (2) with similar developmental profiles (3) foot placement biases that promote stability, and (4) correlations between postural stability and step error. Children used vision to fine-tune both steps and reaches. At all ages, foot placement was biased (albeit not in the predicted directions). Contrary to our predictions, step error was not correlated with postural stability. By 8 years, children's step and reach error were adult-like. Despite similar visual control mechanisms, stepping and reaching had different developmental profiles: step error reduced with age whilst reach error was lower and stable with age. We argue that the development of both visually guided and non-visually guided action is limb-specific.

Indexed as

AdultChildChild DevelopmentFemaleFootHumansMaleMotor ActivityPostural BalancePsychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionYoung AdultDevelopmentPostureReachingSteppingVision

Identifiers

PMID31471678
PMCPMC6794234
OpenAlexW2970394077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.