ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2021
Weight-based enoxaparin with anti-factor Xa assay-based dose adjustment for venous thromboembolic event prophylaxis in adult trauma patients results in improved prophylactic range targeting.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Individualizing Thromboprophylaxis: From Fixed Doses to Targeted Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Use.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Weight-based dosing for low-molecular-weight heparin administration to achieve optimal venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of trauma and injury · 2026Article
- Weight-based, anti-Xa guided enoxaparin after spine trauma surgery: target attainment and safety in a retrospective cohort.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Enoxaparin for VTE thromboprophylaxis during inpatient rehabilitation care: assessment of the standard fixed dosing regimen.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2024Observational
- Weight-based enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis in young trauma patients: analysis of the CLOTT-1 registry.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Article
- Weight-Based Dosing for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spinal Trauma Patients Appears Safe.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Article
- Trauma-induced pulmonary thromboembolism: What's update?Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2022Review
- Pharmacokinetics of enoxaparin in COVID-19 critically ill patients.Thrombosis research · 2021Article
- Characterizing the delays in adequate thromboprophylaxis after TBI.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common morbidity in trauma patients. Standard VTE chemoprophylaxis is often inadequate. We hypothesized that weight-based dosing would result in appropriate prophylaxis more reliably than fixed dosing.
methodsAll patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center over a 6-month period were included unless contra-indications for VTE prophylaxis existed. A prospective adjusted-dosing group was compared to a retrospective uniform-dosing group. The adjusted-dosing approach consisted of initial weight-based dosing of 0.5 mg/kg subcutaneously (subQ) every 12 h (q12h). Peak anti-factor Xa was measured. Patients outside of the prophylactic range had their dose adjusted by ± 10 mg. The uniform-dosing group received 30 mg subQ q12h, without adjustments.
resultsEighty-four patients were included: 44 in the retrospective control cohort and 40 in the prospective experimental cohort. More patients were sub-prophylactically dosed in the uniform-dosing group relative to the adjusted-dosing group (25% vs 5%, p = 0.03). There was no difference in overall prophylactic range targeting, because the supra-prophylactically dosed patients in the adjusted-dosing group eliminated the effect (p = 0.173). However, after a single dose adjustment, zero patients were outside of prophylactic range (25% versus 0%, RR = infinite, p = 0.003). In the uniform-dosing group, anti-Xa level correlated with body surface area (BSA; R
conclusionsWeight-based VTE prophylaxis with anti-Xa-based dose adjustment improves prophylactic range targeting relative to uniform dosing and eliminates variances secondary to BSA and weight in trauma patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.