Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471631›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2020

Is the prognostic nutritional index a prognostic and predictive factor in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with first-line chemotherapy?

Yakup Bozkaya, Osman Köstek, Abdullah Sakin, Deniz Tataroğlu Özyükseler, Teoman Şakalar, İbrahim Çil

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A comparison of three preoperative nutritional assessment methods for predicting ovarian cancer patient prognosis: which is better?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yakup BozkayaClinic of Medical Oncology, Edirne State Hospital, 22030, Edirne, Turkey. dr_yakupbozkaya@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0180-8349
Osman KöstekDepartment of Medical Oncology, Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey.
Abdullah SakinDepartment of Medical Oncology, Yüzüncü Yıl University Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.
Deniz Tataroğlu ÖzyükselerDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBÜ Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.
Teoman ŞakalarDepartment of Medical Oncology, Aksaray University Education and Research Hospital, Aksaray, Turkey.
İbrahim ÇilDepartment of Medical Oncology, SBÜ Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Education and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the prognostic and predictive significance of pretreatment Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (OPNI) in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) treated with first-line chemotherapy. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with metastatic NSCLC who attended five different medical oncology clinics between December 2008 and January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The optimal cut-off point for OPNI was performed by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Patients were assigned to either the low OPNI group or high OPNI group.

resultsA total of 333 patients were included in the study. Significant differences between the low and high OPNI groups were found regarding the rates of response to chemotherapy, sex, and hemoglobin level (p < 0.05). The patients in high OPNI group had a longer overall survival (OS) (15.3 vs. 10.6 months, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (6.7 vs. 5.3 months, p < 0.001) compared to the patients in low OPNI group. A multivariate analysis using Cox regression model revealed that a high OPNI score was an independent prognostic factor of OS (HR = 1.535, p = 0.002) and PFS (HR = 1.336, p = 0.014), but failed to demonstrate a statistical significance of pretreatment OPNI scores in predicting treatment response (p = 0.56).

conclusionsPretreatment OPNI is an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in metastatic NSCLC patients treated with first-line chemotherapy. Thus, it may be used as easily calculated and low-cost prognostic tool in the routine clinical practice in this patient group.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNutrition AssessmentPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSurvival RateFirst-line chemotherapyMetastasticNon-small cell lung cancerOnodera’s prognostic nutritional indexPrognostic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.