Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471613›Full record

ArticleNature methods2019

Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases.

Sarvenaz Choobdar, Mehmet E Ahsen, Jake Crawford, Mattia Tomasoni, Tao Fang, David Lamparter, Junyuan Lin, Benjamin Hescott, Xiaozhe Hu, Johnathan Mercer and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Target identification and assessment in the era of AI.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Sarvenaz Choobdar *Department of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mehmet E Ahsen *Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Jake Crawford *Department of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Mattia TomasoniDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8775-2384
Tao FangRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.
David LamparterDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Junyuan LinDepartment of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Benjamin HescottCollege of Computer and Information Science, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
Xiaozhe HuDepartment of Mathematics, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Johnathan MercerDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ted NatoliBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rajiv NarayanBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
DREAM Module Identification Challenge Consortium
Aravind SubramanianBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jitao D ZhangRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3085-0909
Gustavo StolovitzkyIcahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology and Department of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9618-2819
Zoltán KutalikSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Kasper LageDepartment of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6827-6239
Donna K SlonimDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3357-437X
Julio Saez-RodriguezInstitute for Computational Biomedicine, Faculty of Medicine, Heidelberg University, Bioquant, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8552-8976
Lenore J CowenDepartment of Computer Science, Tufts University, Medford, MA, USA.
Sven BergmannDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. sven.bergmann@unil.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-9034
Daniel MarbachDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. daniel.marbach.dm1@roche.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6686-9249

Funding

Combinatorial and graph theoretical approach to systems biology and mol. evo.ZIALM200887 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI PRZYTYCKA, TERESA · 2009 to 2025
$24.4M
Machine Learning for Drug Response PredictionR35GM133346 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Yuanfang Guan · 2019 to 2026
$3.2M
Critical role of TCF-1 on the epigenetic identity of memory T cellsR01HL145754 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VAHEDI, GOLNAZ · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
A Molecular Assessment of the Consequences of Preterm BirthR01HD076140 · NICHD · TUFTS UNIVERSITY MEDFORD · PI SLONIM, DONNA K. · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL145754NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD076140NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM133346Swiss National Science Foundation 152724Swiss National Science Foundation 169929
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many bioinformatics methods have been proposed for reducing the complexity of large gene or protein networks into relevant subnetworks or modules. Yet, how such methods compare to each other in terms of their ability to identify disease-relevant modules in different types of network remains poorly understood. We launched the 'Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge', an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein-protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies. Our robust assessment of 75 module identification methods reveals top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules correspond to core disease-relevant pathways, which often comprise therapeutic targets. This community challenge establishes biologically interpretable benchmarks, tools and guidelines for molecular network analysis to study human disease biology.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksGenome-Wide Association StudyModels, BiologicalPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociAlgorithmsComputational BiologyDiseaseGene Expression ProfilingHumansPhenotypeProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID31471613
PMCPMC6719725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.