Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471405›Full record

SynthesisIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

First Reported Use of the Faxitron LOCalizer™ Radiofrequency Identification (RFID) System in Europe - A Feasibility Trial, Surgical Guide and Review for Non-palpable Breast Lesions.

Wolfram Malter, Johannes Holtschmidt, Fabinshy Thangarajah, Peter Mallmann, Barbara Krug, Mathias Warm, Christian Eichler

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Evolution of localization methods for non-palpable breast lesions: a literature review from a translational medicine perspective.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wolfram MalterUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany.
Johannes HoltschmidtUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany.
Fabinshy ThangarajahUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany.
Peter MallmannUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany.
Barbara KrugUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Radiology, Cologne, Germany.
Mathias WarmUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany.
Christian EichlerUniversity of Cologne, Faculty of Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cologne, Germany ceichler@gmail.com christian.eichler@uk-koeln.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe problem of adequately marking any given lesion within a breast surgical site is commonly solved by introducing a titanium clip. However, clip dislocation and/or stereotactic hook-wire dislocation are common problems. An ideal solution would be a clip that can be easily found without the use of stereotactic intervention. This work reviews the available data on radiofrequency identification devices (RFID) in breast surgery, reports initial experience data in Europe and discusses surgical pitfalls, advantages and disadvantages. PATIENTS AND

methodsThis study represents a single center, consecutively recruited, initiation trial with subsequent surgeon questionnaire for the first institution in Europe to report Faxitron LOCalizer™ chip data. Four patients with non-palpable tumors were marked with the system and were correlated via mammography, pre- and intra-operative ultrasound and pathology. Data were then compared to available literature and a literature review was added.

resultsThe four patients marked with this RFID system, displayed a 100% success location rate at a 0% complication rate. Surgeons evaluated the new system as being safe to use and only slightly more difficult to place compared to a standard clip. A significant improvement in ultrasound localization and intraoperative localization was also reported for the LOCalizer™ system when compared to a standard titanium clip.

conclusionThis trial added a small number of consecutively recruited patients to an existing number of available data, resulting in a total of 121 evaluated and reviewed Faxitron LOCalizer™ marked non-palpable in-breast lesions worldwide.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGermanyHumansMammographyMiddle AgedRadio Frequency Identification DeviceTreatment OutcomeTumor BurdenUltrasonographybreastFaxitronlesionLocalizerLOCalizer™markingnon-palpablenonpalpableradiofrequency identification deviceRFID

Identifiers

PMID31471405
PMCPMC6754990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.