Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471301›Full record

ReviewApplied and environmental microbiology2019

Public Microbial Resource Centers: Key Hubs for Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) Microorganisms and Genetic Materials.

P Becker, M Bosschaerts, P Chaerle, H-M Daniel, A Hellemans, A Olbrechts, L Rigouts, A Wilmotte, M Hendrickx

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Overview of Conservation of Microbial Genetic Resources.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Review
  2. Article
  3. StrainInfo-the central database for linked microbial strain identifiers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NCBI Taxonomy: a comprehensive update on curation, resources and tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

P BeckerBCCM/IHEM Fungi Collection, Mycology and Aerobiology, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium pierre.becker@sciensano.be.
M BosschaertsBCCM Coordination Cell, Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, Belgium.
P ChaerleBCCM/DCG Diatoms Collection, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
H-M DanielBCCM/MUCL, Mycothèque de l'Université Catholique de Louvain, Earth and Life Institute, Mycology Laboratory, Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
A HellemansBCCM/LMG Bacteria Collection, Laboratory of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
A OlbrechtsBCCM/GeneCorner Plasmid Collection, Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
L RigoutsBCCM/ITM Mycobacteria Collection, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
A WilmotteBCCM/ULC Cyanobacteria Collection, InBios-Centre for Protein Engineering, Université de Liège, Liège, Belgium.
M HendrickxBCCM/IHEM Fungi Collection, Mycology and Aerobiology, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the context of open science, the availability of research materials is essential for knowledge accumulation and to maximize the impact of scientific research. In microbiology, microbial domain biological resource centers (mBRCs) have long-standing experience in preserving and distributing authenticated microbial strains and genetic materials (e.g., recombinant plasmids and DNA libraries) to support new discoveries and follow-on studies. These culture collections play a central role in the conservation of microbial biodiversity and have expertise in cultivation, characterization, and taxonomy of microorganisms. Information associated with preserved biological resources is recorded in databases and is accessible through online catalogues. Legal expertise developed by mBRCs guarantees end users the traceability and legality of the acquired material, notably with respect to the Nagoya Protocol. However, awareness of the advantages of depositing biological materials in professional repositories remains low, and the necessity of securing strains and genetic resources for future research must be emphasized. This review describes the unique position of mBRCs in microbiology and molecular biology through their history, evolving roles, expertise, services, challenges, and international collaborations. It also calls for an increased deposit of strains and genetic resources, a responsibility shared by scientists, funding agencies, and publishers. Journal policies requesting a deposit during submission of a manuscript represent one of the measures to make more biological materials available to the broader community, hence fully releasing their potential and improving openness and reproducibility in scientific research.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualMicrobiologyMolecular BiologyBiodiversityHumansOpen Access Publishingculture collectionFAIRmBRCNagoya Protocolopen access

Identifiers

PMID31471301
PMCPMC6803313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.