Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31471170›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2020

Aromatase inhibitors: The unexpected breast cancer treatment.

Huibrie C Pieters, Emily Green, Miriam Sleven, Annette L Stanton

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Challenges in Obtaining and Seeking Information Among Breast Cancer Survivors in an Asian Country: a Qualitative Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huibrie C PietersSchool of Nursing, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: hpieters@sonnet.ucla.edu.
Emily GreenSchool of Nursing, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
Miriam SlevenTorrance Memorial Medical Center, Torrance, CA, United States of America.
Annette L StantonDepartments of Psychology and Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Los Angeles, United States of America.
University of California, Los Angeles · USTorrance Memorial Medical Center · US

Funding

Decision making on aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer survivors 65 and olderR21CA167218 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PIETERS, HUIBRIE CHRISTELLE · 2013 to 2014
$264k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA167218
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuboptimal adherence with endocrine treatment for breast cancer is influenced by a number of factors but remains poorly understood. We sought to describe the prior knowledge about and expectations of breast cancer treatments among older women retrospecting on their diagnosis and treatment.

methodsThematic analysis was used to systematically analyze data obtained with face-to-face, open-ended interviews conducted with 54 women who had filled at least one prescription for an aromatase inhibitor. The average age was 71.9 (65-93) years at diagnosis.

resultsThree salient themes were described: the sources of information on which preknowledge and expectations surrounding treatment were founded, and two phases of treatment, primary (surgery, chemotherapy and radiation therapy) and anti-hormonal. The main source of information was from family and friends who had been treated for cancer. These peers reported both positive and negative experiences and in many cases contributed to the women having some degree of misinformation. A foundational knowledge of primary treatments was evident (necessity, duration, intensity, side-effects) and that receiving one or more treatments was needed. Compared to primary treatments, anti-hormonal treatment (AHT) was unexpected, the women knew less about it, and felt comparatively under-prepared for this treatment.

conclusionsThe transition from primary treatments to adjuvant AHT therapy with receiving a prescription for an aromatase inhibitor caught many participants off guard. Our findings elucidate areas to enhance clinical practice, expand the research agenda to more thoroughly explore AHT information and design of an age-appropriate supportive intervention to improve continuation with AHT.

Indexed as

Aromatase InhibitorsBreast NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalAromatase InhibitorsAI OR aromatase inhibitorAnti-hormonal therapyBreast cancerDecision-makingEndocrine therapyExpectationsOlder adultPersistence OR adherencePrior knowledge

Identifiers

PMID31471170
PMCPMC7044029
OpenAlexW2970126390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.