ArticleJournal of biomechanics2020
Musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spinal energy balance can predict post-operative spine alignment in Lenke 1 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.Spine deformity · 2026Article
- Machine learning outperforms anthropometric scaling in predicting muscle parameters and spinal loading: a subject-specific musculoskeletal modeling study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Development and Assessment of a Novel Generic Finite Element Spine Model for Clinical Applications.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- ArborSim: Articulated, branching, OpenSim routing for constructing models of multi-jointed appendages with complex muscle-tendon architecture.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Dependence of trunk muscle size and position on age, height, and weight in a multi-ethnic cohort of middle-aged and older men and women.Journal of biomechanics · 2023Article
- Musculotendon Parameters in Lower Limb Models: Simplifications, Uncertainties, and Muscle Force Estimation Sensitivity.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2023Review
- Multibody Models of the Thoracolumbar Spine: A Review on Applications, Limitations, and Challenges.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A computational method for estimating trunk muscle activations during gait using lower extremity muscle synergies.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Biomechanical Morphing for Personalized Fitting of Scoliotic Torso Skeleton Models.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Computational modelling of the scoliotic spine: A literature review.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2021Review
- Spinal Compressive Forces in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With and Without Carrying Loads: A Musculoskeletal Modeling Study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Currently available musculoskeletal inverse-dynamics thoracolumbar spine models are entirely based on data from adults and might therefore not be applicable for simulations in children and adolescents. In addition, these models lack lower extremities, which are required for comprehensive evaluations of functional activities or therapeutic exercises. We therefore created OpenSim-based musculoskeletal full-body models including a detailed thoracolumbar spine for children and adolescents aged 6-18 years and validated by comparing model predictions to in vivo data. After combining our recently developed adult thoracolumbar spine model with a lower extremity model, children and adolescent models were created for each year of age by adjusting segmental length and mass distribution, center of mass positions and moments of inertia of the major body segments as well as sagittal pelvis and spine alignment based on literature data. Similarly, muscle strength properties were adjusted based on CT-derived cross-sectional area measurements. Simulations were conducted from in vivo studies reported in the literature involving children and adolescents evaluating maximum trunk muscle strength (MTMS), lumbar disc compressibility (LDC), intradiscal pressure (IDP) and trunk muscle activity (MA). Model predictions correlated highly with in vivo data (MTMS: r ≥ 0.82, p ≤ 0.03; LDC: r = 0.77, p < 0.001; IDP: r ≥ 0.78, p < 0.001; MA: r ≥ 0.90, p < 0.001), indicating suitability for the reasonably accurate prediction of maximal trunk muscle strength, segmental loading and trunk muscle activity in children and adolescents. When aiming at investigating children or adolescents with pathologies such as idiopathic scoliosis, our models can serve as a basis for the creation of deformed spine models and for comparative purposes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.