Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31470884›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2019

Nepali translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI).

Sudarshan Kc, Saurab Sharma, Karen Ginn, Tawfiq Almadi, Darren Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A comparison between measurement properties of four shoulder-related outcome measures in Nepalese patients with shoulder pain.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sudarshan KcDiscipline of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Saurab SharmaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Kathmandu University School of Medical Sciences, Dhulikhel, Kavre, Nepal. saurabsharma1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9817-5372
Karen GinnDiscipline of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Tawfiq AlmadiDiscipline of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Darren ReedDiscipline of Anatomy and Histology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) is a 13-item shoulder-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The English version is easy to use and has demonstrated excellent measurement properties for both clinical and research settings. The availability of the SPADI in Nepali would facilitate shoulder research and enhance management of patients with shoulder pain in Nepal. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the SPADI into Nepali (SPADI-NP) and evaluate its measurement properties.

methodsThe translation and adaptation process followed international guidelines. Participants completed SPADI-NP on two assessments (N = 150 at initial and 119 at follow-up assessment). A Nepali version of the Global Rating of Change score was completed at follow-up. Assessment of measurement properties included analysis of internal consistency (Cronbach's α), minimal detectable change (MDC) with standard error of measurement (SEM), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient; ICC), validity (factor structure, construct using Pearson's correlation with the Disability of Arm and Hand [DASH]) and responsiveness (area under the curve; AUC) with minimal important change (MIC).

resultsMinor changes were integrated in the adaptation process to improve cultural relevance such as dress items. Items were largely loaded under two factors (pain and disability), internal consistencies were good for the pain construct (α = 0.82) and disability (α = 0.88) and test-retest reliability was excellent (pain = 0.89, disability = 0.96). MDC was 5.7 (out of 100) with SEM = 2.1. Strong associations with the DASH (r = 0.63 pain, r = 0.81 disability) demonstrated its construct validity. The AUC was 0.68 and MIC was 12.3 (out of 100).

conclusionThe Nepali version of the SPADI demonstrated excellent reliability and validity. It can be used for the assessment of shoulder pain and disability in patients with shoulder pain in Nepal in both clinical practice and research.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonTranslationsAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNepalPain MeasurementPilot ProjectsPrincipal Component AnalysisReproducibility of ResultsShoulder PainClinimetricsDisabilityOutcome assessmentPainPsychometricsShoulder painSPADITranslation

Identifiers

PMID31470884
PMCPMC6716895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.