Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31470865›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2019

Patient-reported quality of life and hand disability in elderly patients after a traumatic hand injury - a retrospective study.

Ingrid Reitan, Lars B Dahlin, Hans-Eric Rosberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ingrid ReitanDepartment of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Jan Waldenströms gata 5, SE-20502, Malmö, Sweden.
Lars B DahlinDepartment of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Jan Waldenströms gata 5, SE-20502, Malmö, Sweden.
Hans-Eric RosbergDepartment of Hand Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Jan Waldenströms gata 5, SE-20502, Malmö, Sweden. hanse.rosberg@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9229-2319
Skåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

Capio Forskningsstiftelse 2016-2954Medicinska Fakulteten, Lunds Universitet N/ARegion Skåne 2014/354Stiftelsen Ragnhild och Einar Lundströms Minne LA2017-0282Stiftelsen Sigurd and Elsa Goljes Minne LA2015-0339
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHand injuries occur at any age and cause disability in hand and arm function as well as impaired quality of life, but no study has focused on hand disability and quality of life in the elderly after a hand injury. Globally, the population over 60 years of age is expected to double by 2050 and more hand injuries are estimated among the elderly population. Our goal is to obtain more information and a better understanding of problems elderly patients experience after a hand injury to be able in the future to optimally relocate resources in the health care sector with respect to numbers and injury pattern as well as to health status of these patients.

methodsPatients aged more than 65 years with a traumatic hand/wrist/forearm injury treated (July 1st 2013 - June 30th 2014) at department of Hand Surgery, Malmö, Sweden were included. Health-related outcome questionnaires, i.e. QuickDASH, SF-36, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Cold Intolerance Severity Score (CISS), and general information were mailed to the patients (time from injury: > 1.5-2.5 years). The participants were compared in groups according to age, gender, cold intolerance, injury severity and previous occupation.

resultsOne hundred and thirty-seven participants responded [response rate 55%; non-responders (n = 113); only difference between groups was that non-responders were older]. Women were older than men at the time of injury (p = 0.04) and differed regarding living conditions. The main differences in QuickDASH, all VAS questions, and the majority of SF-36 subscales (p < 0.05) were found in the participants with CISS > 50, who experienced more impairment. More serious injuries (Modified HISS) were found to have higher QuickDASH and CISS score as well as more functional impairment (p < 0.05). Few differences were found in groups divided according to age, gender (although men experiencing less functional impairment in QuickDASH), previous occupation and injured hand.

conclusionsPatients aged more than 65 years at the time a hand injury was sustained, generally experience a high-level quality of life and limited functional problems after such an injury, but patients with CISS > 50 and with a more serious injury were more severely affected.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAgedDisability EvaluationFemaleHand InjuriesHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSwedenCISSElderlyHand disabilityHand injuryQuality of lifeQuickDASH

Identifiers

PMID31470865
PMCPMC6716918
OpenAlexW2971317079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.