Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31470856›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2019

Evaluation of a shared decision-making communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma: a mixed methods study using simulated patients.

Evamaria Müller, Alice Diesing, Anke Rosahl, Isabelle Scholl, Martin Härter, Angela Buchholz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evamaria MüllerDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany. e.mueller@uke.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7067-7074
Alice DiesingDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Anke RosahlDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Isabelle SchollDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Martin HärterDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Angela BuchholzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52 (W26), D-20246, Hamburg, Germany.
Universität Hamburg · DE

Funding

Mundipharma GmbH not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundShared decision-making (SDM) is a key principle in asthma management, but continues to be poorly implemented in routine care. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a SDM communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma on the SDM behaviors of physicians, and to analyze physician views on the training.

methodsA mixed methods study with a partially mixed sequential equal status design was conducted to evaluate a 12 h SDM communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma. It included a short introductory talk, videotaped consultations with simulated asthma patients, video analysis in small group sessions, individual feedback, short presentations, group discussions, and practical exercises. The quantitative evaluation phase consisted of a before (t0) after (t1) comparison of SDM performance using the observer-rated OPTION

resultsInitially, 29 physicians participated in the study, 27 physicians provided quantitative data, and 22 physicians provided qualitative data for analysis. Quantitative results showed significantly improved performance in SDM following the training (t1) when compared with performance in SDM before the training (t0) (OPTION

conclusionThe SDM communication skills training for physicians treating patients with asthma has potential to improve SDM performance, but would benefit from using real patient consultations.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedAgedAsthmaClinical CompetenceCommunicationFeedbackFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPatient SimulationPhysician-Patient RelationsPhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesTape RecordingAdherenceEducationPatient-centered carePatient participationPhysician-patient relations

Identifiers

PMID31470856
PMCPMC6716840
OpenAlexW2970128458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.