Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31470590›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2019

Frontal Alpha Asymmetry and Inhibitory Control among Individuals with Cannabis Use Disorders.

Alina Shevorykin, Lesia M Ruglass, Robert D Melara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cannabis use disorder: from neurobiology to treatment.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alina ShevorykinPace University, Department of Mental Health Counseling and Psychology, 861 Bedford Road, Marks 22, Pleasantville, NY 10570, USA. alina113@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9594-2345
Lesia M RuglassRutgers University, Center of Alcohol and Substance Use Studies, Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, 607 Allison Road, Smithers Hall, 222, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Robert D MelaraThe City College of New York, CUNY, Department of Psychology, 160 Convent Avenue, NAC 7120, New York, NY 10031, USA.

Funding

American Psychological Association's Office of Ethnic Minority Affairs N/ACity College of New York City Seeds Fund N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand the biopsychosocial mechanisms associated with development and maintenance of cannabis use disorder (CUD), we examined frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) as a measure of approach bias and inhibitory control in cannabis users versus healthy nonusers. We investigated: (1) whether FAA could distinguish cannabis users from healthy controls; (2) whether there are cue-specific FAA effects in cannabis users versus controls; and (3) the time course of cue-specific approach motivation and inhibitory control processes. EEG data were analyzed from forty participants (CUD (

Indexed as

cannabinoidscannabis use disordercravingcue reactivityEEGfrontal alpha asymmetryinhibitory control

Identifiers

PMID31470590
PMCPMC6770848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.