ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis2019
Chromatographic editing enhances natural product discovery.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in capturing and mining mass spectrometry data are transforming natural products research.Natural product reports · 2021Review
- Discovery of New Secondary Metabolites by Epigenetic Regulation and NMR Comparison from the Plant Endophytic FungusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fungi are known for their diverse biologically active secondary metabolites, compounds that have provided the basis for many landmark therapeutics in the last century. Due to ease of collection and culturing, the existing fungal chemical literature is vast, and fungal natural product isolation can often be hindered by the numerous nuisance and pan-toxic compounds that many strains produce. Dereplication efforts, aimed at identifying such compounds early in the purification, are imperative to reduce time and expense of rediscovery of known metabolites. The common practice of dereplication then deprioritizes samples containing nuisance compounds and often excludes them from the drug discovery workflow. We have implemented a two-step dereplication protocol that uses tandem mass spectrometry to identify nuisance compounds, followed by mass-directed chromatographic editing to remove them while leaving the remaining 'edited extract' in the drug discovery workflow. This two-step strategy facilitates rapid and more accurate evaluation of the chemical potential of high-throughput extract screening campaigns by consideration of bioactivity beyond that triggered by known metabolites. We demonstrate the isolation of a new natural product antibiotic from an otherwise toxic extract using the technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.