Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469995›Full record

ReviewNeuropharmacology2020

Validated animal models for antiseizure drug (ASD) discovery: Advantages and potential pitfalls in ASD screening.

Melissa Barker-Haliski, H Steve White

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuropharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. ENX-101, a GABAEpilepsia · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Melissa Barker-HaliskiDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: mhaliski@uw.edu.
H Steve WhiteDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington · US

Funding

NCCIH Supplement to NCATS/CTSA Program for KL2 Scholars - M. SoddersKL2TR002317 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Christy Michelle McKinney · 2017 to 2026
$14.5M
Institute of Translational Health SciencesKL2TR000421 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DISIS, MARY L. · 2012 to 2016
$12.6M
Mechanisms of Brain Dysmorphology in MN1 C-Terminal Truncation Syndrome, a Novel Intellectual Developmental Disability Disorder P50HD103524 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DANIEL DOHERTY · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterU54HD083091 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DOHERTY, DANIEL · 2014 to 2019
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000421NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR002317NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103524NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since 1993, over 20 new anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) have been identified in well-established animal seizure and epilepsy models and subsequently demonstrated to be clinically effective in double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with focal onset seizures. All clinically-available ASDs on the market today are effective in at least one of only three preclinical seizure and epilepsy models: the acute maximal electroshock (MES), the acute subcutaneous pentylenetetrazol (scPTZ) test, or the kindled rodent with chronic evoked seizures. Thus, it reasons that preclinical ASD discovery does not need significant revision to successfully identify ASDs for the symptomatic treatment of epilepsy. Unfortunately, a significant need still persists for more efficacious and better tolerated ASDs. This is particularly true for those patients whose seizures remain drug resistant. This review will focus on the continued utility of the acute MES and scPTZ tests, as well as the kindled rodent for current and future ASD discovery. These are the only "clinically validated" rodent models to date and been heavily used in the search for novel and more efficacious ASDs. This is to say that promising ASDs have been brought to the clinic on the basis of efficacy in these particular seizure and epilepsy models alone. This review also discusses some of the inherent advantages and limitations of these models relative to existing and emerging preclinical models. It then offers insight into future efforts to develop a preclinical model that will advance a truly transformative therapy for the symptomatic treatment of difficult to treat focal onset epilepsy. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsAnticonvulsantsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug DiscoveryDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalEpilepsyHumansKindling, NeurologicPentylenetetrazoleReproducibility of ResultsSeizuresAnticonvulsantsPentylenetetrazoleAnimal modelsASD discoveryEpilepsyKindlingMaximal electroshockMESPentylenetetrazolPTZSeizure

Identifiers

PMID31469995
PMCPMC7470169
OpenAlexW2970952334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.