Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469850›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Predicting vaccine effectiveness in livestock populations: A theoretical framework applied to PRRS virus infections in pigs.

Vasiliki Bitsouni, Samantha Lycett, Tanja Opriessnig, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Why DoesFrontiers in immunology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review: Livestock disease resilience: from individual to herd level.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2021
    Review
  11. Risk Factors for Positivity to Shiga Toxin-ProducingInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Vasiliki BitsouniThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0684-0583
Samantha LycettThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-3159-596X
Tanja OpriessnigThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Andrea Doeschl-WilsonThe Roslin Institute and R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Midlothian, Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.
Roslin Institute · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20002173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines remain one of the main tools to control infectious diseases in domestic livestock. Although a plethora of veterinary vaccines are on the market and routinely applied to protect animals against infection with particular pathogens, the disease in question often continues to persist, sometimes at high prevalence. The limited effectiveness of certain vaccines in the field leaves open questions regarding the required properties that an effective vaccine should have, as well as the most efficient vaccination strategy for achieving the intended goal of vaccination programmes. To date a systematic approach for studying the combined effects of different types of vaccines and vaccination strategies is lacking. In this paper, we develop a theoretical framework for modelling the epidemiological consequences of vaccination with imperfect vaccines of various types, administered using different strategies to herds with different replacement rates and heterogeneity in vaccine responsiveness. Applying the model to the Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome (PRRS), which despite routine vaccination remains one of the most significant endemic swine diseases worldwide, we then examine the influence of these diverse factors alone and in combination, on within-herd virus transmission. We derive threshold conditions for preventing infection invasion in the case of imperfect vaccines inducing limited sterilizing immunity. The model developed in this study has practical implications for the development of vaccines and vaccination programmes in livestock populations not only for PRRS, but also for other viral infections primarily transmitted by direct contact.

Indexed as

AnimalsLivestockModels, BiologicalPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusSwineVaccinationViral VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID31469850
PMCPMC6716781
OpenAlexW2970774692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.