Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469846›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Predicting sediment and nutrient concentrations from high-frequency water-quality data.

Catherine Leigh, Sevvandi Kandanaarachchi, James M McGree, Rob J Hyndman, Omar Alsibai, Kerrie Mengersen, Erin E Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reconstructing Missing and Anomalous Data Collected from High-Frequency In-Situ Sensors in Fresh Waters.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Catherine LeighARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4186-1678
Sevvandi KandanaarachchiARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.
James M McGreeARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.
Rob J HyndmanARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.
Omar AlsibaiARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.
Kerrie MengersenARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.
Erin E PetersonARC Centre of Excellence for Mathematical & Statistical Frontiers (ACEMS), Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water-quality monitoring in rivers often focuses on the concentrations of sediments and nutrients, constituents that can smother biota and cause eutrophication. However, the physical and economic constraints of manual sampling prohibit data collection at the frequency required to adequately capture the variation in concentrations through time. Here, we developed models to predict total suspended solids (TSS) and oxidized nitrogen (NOx) concentrations based on high-frequency time series of turbidity, conductivity and river level data from in situ sensors in rivers flowing into the Great Barrier Reef lagoon. We fit generalized-linear mixed-effects models with continuous first-order autoregressive correlation structures to water-quality data collected by manual sampling at two freshwater sites and one estuarine site and used the fitted models to predict TSS and NOx from the in situ sensor data. These models described the temporal autocorrelation in the data and handled observations collected at irregular frequencies, characteristics typical of water-quality monitoring data. Turbidity proved a useful and generalizable surrogate of TSS, with high predictive ability in the estuarine and fresh water sites. Turbidity, conductivity and river level served as combined surrogates of NOx. However, the relationship between NOx and the covariates was more complex than that between TSS and turbidity, and consequently the ability to predict NOx was lower and less generalizable across sites than for TSS. Furthermore, prediction intervals tended to increase during events, for both TSS and NOx models, highlighting the need to include measures of uncertainty routinely in water-quality reporting. Our study also highlights that surrogate-based models used to predict sediments and nutrients need to better incorporate temporal components if variance estimates are to be unbiased and model inference meaningful. The transferability of models across sites, and potentially regions, will become increasingly important as organizations move to automated sensing for water-quality monitoring throughout catchments.

Indexed as

Water QualityFresh WaterGeologic SedimentsModels, StatisticalNitrogen OxidesNutrientsNitrogen OxidesNutrients

Identifiers

PMID31469846
PMCPMC6716630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.