Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469821›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2019

The alternative reality of plant mitochondrial DNA: One ring does not rule them all.

Alexander Kozik, Beth A Rowan, Dean Lavelle, Lidija Berke, M Eric Schranz, Richard W Michelmore, Alan C Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. TheGenes · 2026
    Article
  4. Exploring the Mitochondrial Genomes ofEcology and evolution · 2026
    Article
  5. A Compact Multipartite Mitogenome ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Chromosomal evolution and speciation inferred from chromosome-scale genome assemblies in three Cupressaceae species.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alexander KozikGenome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6541-9329
Beth A RowanGenome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7240-4889
Dean LavelleGenome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.
Lidija BerkeWageningen University & Research, PB Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3842-9462
M Eric SchranzWageningen University & Research, PB Wageningen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-6565
Richard W MichelmoreGenome Center and Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7512-592X
Alan C ChristensenSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1125-3172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant mitochondrial genomes are usually assembled and displayed as circular maps based on the widely-held view across the broad community of life scientists that circular genome-sized molecules are the primary form of plant mitochondrial DNA, despite the understanding by plant mitochondrial researchers that this is an inaccurate and outdated concept. Many plant mitochondrial genomes have one or more pairs of large repeats that can act as sites for inter- or intramolecular recombination, leading to multiple alternative arrangements (isoforms). Most mitochondrial genomes have been assembled using methods unable to capture the complete spectrum of isoforms within a species, leading to an incomplete inference of their structure and recombinational activity. To document and investigate underlying reasons for structural diversity in plant mitochondrial DNA, we used long-read (PacBio) and short-read (Illumina) sequencing data to assemble and compare mitochondrial genomes of domesticated (Lactuca sativa) and wild (L. saligna and L. serriola) lettuce species. We characterized a comprehensive, complex set of isoforms within each species and compared genome structures between species. Physical analysis of L. sativa mtDNA molecules by fluorescence microscopy revealed a variety of linear, branched, and circular structures. The mitochondrial genomes for L. sativa and L. serriola were identical in sequence and arrangement and differed substantially from L. saligna, indicating that the mitochondrial genome structure did not change during domestication. From the isoforms in our data, we infer that recombination occurs at repeats of all sizes at variable frequencies. The differences in genome structure between L. saligna and the two other Lactuca species can be largely explained by rare recombination events that rearranged the structure. Our data demonstrate that representations of plant mitochondrial genomes as simple, circular molecules are not accurate descriptions of their true nature and that in reality plant mitochondrial DNA is a complex, dynamic mixture of forms.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, MitochondrialGenome, PlantLactucaMitochondriaRecombination, GeneticSequence Analysis, DNADNA, MitochondrialDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID31469821
PMCPMC6742443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.