Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469510›Full record

ArticleHealth economics2019

The marginal benefits of healthcare spending in the Netherlands: Estimating cost-effectiveness thresholds using a translog production function.

Niek Stadhouders, Xander Koolman, Christel van Dijk, Patrick Jeurissen, Eddy Adang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health economics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. The Efficiency of the German Healthcare System: Some Puzzling Findings.The International journal of health planning and management · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Model-Based Estimate of the Cost-Effectiveness Threshold in Germany.Applied health economics and health policy · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Are quality-adjusted medical prices declining for chronic disease? Evidence from diabetes care in four health systems.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Niek StadhoudersScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7296-2335
Xander KoolmanTalma Institute, Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Christel van DijkNational Health Care Institute, Diemen, Netherlands.
Patrick JeurissenScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Eddy AdangRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Funding

Zorginstituut Nederland
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

New technologies may displace existing, higher-value care under a fixed budget. Countries aim to curtail adoption of low-value technologies, for example, by installing cost-effectiveness thresholds. Our objective is to estimate the opportunity cost of hospital care to identify a threshold value for the Netherlands. To this aim, we combine claims data, mortality data and quality of life questionnaires from 2012 to 2014 for 11,000 patient groups to obtain quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) outcomes and spending. Using a fixed effects translog model, we estimate that a 1% increase in hospital spending on average increases QALY outcomes by 0.2%. This implies a threshold of €73,600 per QALY, with 95% confidence intervals ranging from €53,000 to €94,000 per QALY. The results stipulate that new technologies with incremental cost effectiveness ratios exceeding the Dutch upper reference value of €80,000 may indeed displace more valuable care.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCost of IllnessFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLife ExpectancyMalecost-effectivenesshealth care spendingQALYthresholdtranslog function

Identifiers

PMID31469510
PMCPMC6851736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.