ArticleJAMA network open2019
Comparison of Liver Transplant Wait-List Outcomes Among Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Public vs Private Medical Insurance.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Priming of Sorafenib Prior to Radiofrequency Ablation Does Not Increase Treatment Effect in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2022Trial
- A Dual-Activated Catalytic Hairpin Assembly Signal Amplification Nanoplatform for High-Sensitivity Detection of Dual-Target MicroRNAs.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Investigating Disparities Related to Insurance Status and Access to Locoregional Therapies for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Outcomes in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.The Journal of surgical research · 2026Article
- Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Referred for Liver Transplantation After Nucleos(t)ide Analog Cessation.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2025Article
- Healthcare Disparities in the Treatment and Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in South Africa.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Association of Clinical, Psychosocial, and Social Determinants of Health Factors and Liver Transplantation and Waitlist Removal for MASH.Transplantation direct · 2025Article
- The Role of Ablative Techniques in the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Indications and Outcomes.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- A scoping review of inequities in access to organ transplant in the United States.International journal for equity in health · 2022Article
- The influence of equitable access policies and socioeconomic factors on post-liver transplant survival.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Association between socioeconomic status and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Racial Disparity in Liver Transplantation Listing.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2021Article
- Impact of Payer Status on Delisting Among Liver Transplant Candidates in the United States.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2021Article
- Ethnicity and Insurance-Specific Disparities in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score at Time of Liver Transplant Waitlist Registration and its Impact on Mortality.Journal of clinical and experimental hepatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: There are well-documented racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in access to health care among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, there are little data on the association of insurance type with liver transplant (LT) wait-list outcomes for patients with HCC. Objective: To examine LT wait-list outcomes for patients with HCC and public insurance compared with patients with private insurance. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center cohort study included 705 adult patients with HCC who had Model for End-Stage Liver Disease exceptions and were included on a waiting list for LT from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016. Patients with Kaiser Permanente medical insurance, other private medical insurance, or public medical insurance were included. Data analysis was conducted from May 2018 to October 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was cumulative incidence of LT waiting list dropout within 2 years of waiting list enrollment (baseline). Secondary outcomes included competing-risks analysis to identify risk factors associated with wait-list outcomes. Results: Among 705 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 61 [57-65] years; 537 [76.2%] men) with HCC on an LT waiting list, 349 patients (49.5%) had Kaiser Permanente insurance, 157 patients (22.3%) had other private insurance, and 199 patients (28.2%) had public insurance. Median (interquartile range) follow-up was 13.2 (7.8-18.7) months. Tumor characteristics were similar among insurance types. The cumulative incidence of dropout owing to tumor progression or death within 2 years of baseline was 21.8% (95% CI, 17.2%-26.7%) among the Kaiser Permanente insurance group, 25.5% (95% CI, 18.6%-33.0%) among the other private insurance group, and 35.5% (95% CI, 28.3%-42.7%) among the public insurance group (P < .001). The cumulative incidence of LT within 2 years of baseline was 67.3% (95% CI, 61.2%-72.6%) among the Kaiser Permanente insurance group, 64.1% (95% CI, 55.2%-71.7%) among the other private insurance group, and 48.5% (95% CI, 40.4%-56.1%) among the public insurance group (P < .001). In competing-risks multivariable analysis compared with patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance, patients with public insurance were associated with increased risk of dropout (hazard ratio [HR], 1.69 [95% CI, 1.17-2.43]; P = .005), but patients with other private insurance were not (HR, 1.40 [95% CI, 0.94-2.08]; P = .10). Waiting list dropout was also significantly associated with an α-fetoprotein level 100 ng/mL or higher (HR, 2.8 [95% CI, 1.98-3.88]; P < .001), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score at baseline (HR per point, 1.06 [95% CI, 1.03-1.09]; P < .001), and 3 or more lesions at baseline (HR vs 1 lesion of 2- to 3-cm diameter, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.27-3.37]; P = .004). Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort of patients with HCC on an LT waiting list, patients with public insurance were associated with worse wait-list outcomes compared with patients with Kaiser Permanente insurance or other private insurance, despite similar tumor-related characteristics at baseline. Improved health care coordination and delivery may be options to reduce these disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.