Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469393›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2019

Effect of Sequential or Active Choice for Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Shivan J Mehta, Vikranth Induru, David Santos, Catherine Reitz, Timothy McAuliffe, Charles Orellana, Kevin G Volpp, David A Asch, Chyke A Doubeni

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03246438 (Choice Architecture and Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03246438 nacompletednot on this map

Choice Architecture and Mailed Outreach for Colorectal Cancer Screening

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2017 to 2018Enrolled423ConditionsCancer of ColonArmsColonoscopy only, Colonoscopy outreach + mailed FIT follow-up, Colonoscopy + Mailed FIT outreach and follow-up
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Behavioral Interventions Improve Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Overdue Patients in a Randomized Trial.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026
    Trial
  4. A Randomized Trial of Choice Architecture and Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach in a Community Health Setting.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shivan J MehtaDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Vikranth InduruDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David SantosDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Catherine ReitzDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Timothy McAuliffeDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Charles OrellanaClinical Care Associates, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Kevin G VolppDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
David A AschDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
Chyke A DoubeniDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
University of Pennsylvania · USPhiladelphia VA Medical Center · US

Funding

The Penn Roybal Center on Behavioral Economics and Health: Solving for Scale and Impact with Design Thinking, Digital Platforms, and Dynamic AdaptationP30AG034546 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Alison Meredith Buttenheim · 2009 to 2026
$10.6M
Effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in average risk adults: Colonoscopy vs. FITR01CA213645 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOUBENI, CHYKE ABADAMA · 2017 to 2021
$3.2M
Behavioral Economics and Population-based Colorectal Cancer ScreeningK08CA234326 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MEHTA, SHIVAN JATIN · 2018 to 2022
$1.3M
Undergraduate Clinical Scholars Program: Pathway to Clinical Research CareersR25DK108711 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 2017 to 2026
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA234326NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213645NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034546NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK108711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Colonoscopy and fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are considered top-tier tests for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Behavioral economic insights about "choice architecture" suggest that participation could be influenced by how people are presented test options. Objective: To investigate response rates for offering colonoscopy only compared with sequential choice (colonoscopy and then FIT) or active choice (colonoscopy or FIT) through mailed outreach. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three-arm pragmatic randomized clinical trial conducted between November 14, 2017, and May 14, 2018. The setting was primary care practices at an academic health system. Patients aged 50 to 74 years with at least 2 primary care visits in the 2-year preenrollment period were included if they were eligible but not up to date on CRC screening. Interventions: Eligible patients received mailed outreach about CRC screening. Equal numbers of eligible patients were randomly assigned to 3 outreach groups to receive mailings about CRC screening with the following options: (1) direct phone number to call for scheduling colonoscopy (colonoscopy only), (2) direct phone number to call for colonoscopy and a mailed FIT kit if no response within 4 weeks (sequential choice), or (3) direct phone number to call for colonoscopy and a mailed FIT kit offered at the same time (active choice). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was CRC screening completion (FIT or colonoscopy) within 4 months of initial outreach. The secondary outcomes were CRC screening completion within 6 months of outreach and the choice of colonoscopy as a screening test. Results: In total, 438 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis, with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range, 52-63 years); 55.0% were women. At 4 months, the CRC screening completion rates were 14.4% (95% CI, 8.7%-20.1%) in the colonoscopy-only arm, 17.1% (95% CI, 11.0%-23.2%) in the sequential choice arm, and 19.9% (95% CI, 13.4%-26.4%) in the active choice arm. Neither choice arm achieved a screening rate statistically greater than that in the colonoscopy-alone arm. Among those who completed CRC screening at 4 months, 90.5% (95% CI, 78.0%-103.0%) chose colonoscopy in the colonoscopy-only arm, which was significantly higher than the 52.0% (95% CI, 32.4%-71.6%; P = .005) and 37.9% (95% CI, 20.2%-55.6%; P < .001) in the sequential choice and active choice arms, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: There was no significant increase in CRC screening when offering sequential or active choice, but there was a lower rate of colonoscopy in the choice arms than in the colonoscopy-only arm. Subtle changes in sequencing or defaults can alter patient decision making related to preventive health. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03246438.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAgedChoice BehaviorColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEconomics, BehavioralFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedOccult BloodPhiladelphiaPostal ServicePrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID31469393
PMCPMC6724166
OpenAlexW2970578890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.