Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31469085›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2019

Amputees' Attitudes Toward Participation in Amputee Support Groups and the Role of Virtual Technology in Supporting Amputees: Survey Study.

Edward P Nathan, Sandra L Winkler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics and Outcomes of Limb Loss Support Groups.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Peer Support for Individuals with Major Limb Loss: a Scoping Review.Canadian prosthetics & orthotics journal · 2023
    Article
  5. COVID-19: A catalyst for change in virtual health care utilization for persons with limb loss.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Edward P Nathan *Roy H Park School of Communications, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8068-2248
Sandra L Winkler *Research Service, James A Haley Veterans Affairs Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4160-7672
Ithaca College · USNova Southeastern University · US

Funding

Dissemination of Amputation and Prosthetic Evidenced-based Medicine (DAP-EM)R24HS022021 · AHRQ · TAMPA VA RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FDN · PI WINKLER, SANDRA L. · 2013 to 2015
$899k
AHRQ HHS R24 HS022021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAcquiring information about and living with an amputation (or limb differential) is a lifelong endeavor. Although medical institutions address the immediate medical needs of amputees, information regarding how to live life as an amputee is provided from numerous sources, one of which is amputee support groups.

objectiveThis study aimed at understanding why amputees join support groups, leave support groups, and possibly return to support groups as well as how technology, specifically virtual reality, might play a role in supporting patients' needs. The results are intended to provide data for support groups, to increase their impact on amputee participants.

methodsA 38-item online survey was developed based on the findings of a previous randomized trial. The survey was administered between April and September 2018 and divided into four sections: Demographics, Limb Loss History, Amputee Support Group Participation, and Technology Usage. Items used multiple-choice, drop-down menu, check-box formats with explanation boxes for open-ended responses. Descriptive analyses were performed for both qualitative (open-ended questions) and quantitative data.

resultsOf the 59 amputees enrolled, 54 completed the survey. All the respondents were aged 20-39 years, and nearly half of the older respondents thought audio and video teleconferencing or avatar-based technology would increase participation in support groups. The results suggest that an early goal for amputees who join support groups is to focus on regaining mobility and functionality in order to return to their normal life. Once achieved, the goal transitions to one of social connection with other amputees, although there is a caveat: Simply being an amputee may not provide sufficient connections for developing long-term social relationships. The strongest reason for joining a support group was to learn about living with an amputation, followed by networking and learning new skills.

conclusionsThe results suggest four key takeaways regarding amputee participation in support groups: (1) the needs of participants in amputee support groups change over time; (2) meeting content needs to be relevant to agendas primarily driven by participants; (3) support group participation is also driven by the desire to increase functionality by developing skills, become familiar with prosthetic technology, have more than amputation in common with other participants, and participate at the designated meeting time and location; and (4) the use of technology should support patients' needs.

Indexed as

amputationamputeesupportsupport groupsurveytechnologyvirtualvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID31469085
PMCPMC6777423
OpenAlexW2978517518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.