ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020
Identifying routine clinical predictors of non-adherence to second-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort analysis in a large primary care database.
Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Non-adherence to non-insulin glucose-lowering drugs: Prevalence, predictors and impact on glycemic control and insulin initiation. A longitudinal cohort study in a large primary care database in Spain.The European journal of general practice · 2023Article
- Comparison of causal forest and regression-based approaches to evaluate treatment effect heterogeneity: an application for type 2 diabetes precision medicine.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Adherence to Oral Antidiabetic Drugs in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Supporting People With Type 2 Diabetes in the Effective Use of Their Medicine Through Mobile Health Technology Integrated With Clinical Care to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk: Protocol for an Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Treatment-Related Attributes of Diabetes Therapies and How People with Type 2 Diabetes Report Their Impact on Indicators of Medication-Taking Behaviors.Patient preference and adherence · 2022Review
- What Next After Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes? Selecting the Right Drug for the Right Patient.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Identifying routine clinical predictors of non-adherence to second-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort analysis in a large primary care database.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo investigate whether combinations of routinely available clinical features can predict which patients are likely to be non-adherent to diabetes medication. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 67 882 patients with prescription records for their first and second oral glucose-lowering therapies were identified from electronic healthcare records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Non-adherence was defined as a medical possession ratio (MPR) ≤80%. Potential predictors were examined, including age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin, Charlson index and other recent prescriptions.
resultsRoutine clinical features were poor at predicting non-adherence to the first diabetes therapy (c-statistic = 0.601 for all in combined model). Non-adherence to the second drug was better predicted for all combined factors (c-statistic =0.715) but this improvement was predominantly a result of including adherence to the first drug (c-statistic =0.695 for this alone). Patients with an MPR ≤80% for their first drug were 3.6 times (95% confidence interval 3.3,3.8) more likely to be non-adherent to their second drug (32% vs. 9%).
conclusionsAlthough certain clinical features were associated with poor adherence, their performance for predicting who is likely to be non-adherent, even when combined, was weak. The strongest predictor of adherence to second-line therapy was adherence to the first therapy. Examining previous prescription records could offer a practical way for clinicians to identify potentially non-adherent patients and is an area warranting further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.