Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468676›Full record

ArticleDiabetes, obesity & metabolism2020

Identifying routine clinical predictors of non-adherence to second-line therapies in type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort analysis in a large primary care database.

Beverley M Shields, Andrew T Hattersley, Andrew J Farmer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. What Next After Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes? Selecting the Right Drug for the Right Patient.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beverley M ShieldsInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3785-327X
Andrew T HattersleyInstitute of Biomedical and Clinical Science, University of Exeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Andrew J FarmerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1214-20003Medical Research Council MR/N00633X/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo investigate whether combinations of routinely available clinical features can predict which patients are likely to be non-adherent to diabetes medication. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 67 882 patients with prescription records for their first and second oral glucose-lowering therapies were identified from electronic healthcare records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink). Non-adherence was defined as a medical possession ratio (MPR) ≤80%. Potential predictors were examined, including age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, duration of diabetes, glycated haemoglobin, Charlson index and other recent prescriptions.

resultsRoutine clinical features were poor at predicting non-adherence to the first diabetes therapy (c-statistic = 0.601 for all in combined model). Non-adherence to the second drug was better predicted for all combined factors (c-statistic =0.715) but this improvement was predominantly a result of including adherence to the first drug (c-statistic =0.695 for this alone). Patients with an MPR ≤80% for their first drug were 3.6 times (95% confidence interval 3.3,3.8) more likely to be non-adherent to their second drug (32% vs. 9%).

conclusionsAlthough certain clinical features were associated with poor adherence, their performance for predicting who is likely to be non-adherent, even when combined, was weak. The strongest predictor of adherence to second-line therapy was adherence to the first therapy. Examining previous prescription records could offer a practical way for clinicians to identify potentially non-adherent patients and is an area warranting further research.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Medication AdherenceHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective Studiesadherencecompliancemedical possession ratiomedicationsecond-linetherapytreatmentType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31468676
PMCPMC6916179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.