ArticleThe Laryngoscope2020
The role of elective neck dissection in high-grade parotid malignancy: A hospital-based cohort study.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Update on salivary gland surgery].HNO · 2026Review
- Contemporary Management of Malignancies of the Parotid Gland: A State-of-the-Art Review.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Management of Clinically Node-Negative Salivary Gland Cancer: Observation, Neck Dissection, or Neck Irradiation?Head & neck · 2025Article
- Neck Dissection in cT3/T4 Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity and Oropharynx.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Inference for treatment-specific survival curves using machine learning.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisThe role of elective neck dissection (END) in patients with clinically N0 (cN0), high-grade parotid carcinoma is unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the association between END and survival in patients with cN0, high-grade parotid carcinoma. STUDY
designRetrospective, multicenter cohort study.
methodsA review of hospital-based cases from the National Cancer Data Base was performed. Participants included patients diagnosed with cN0, high-grade parotid cancer between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2013. The primary exposure was receipt of neck dissection. Secondary exposures included receipt of adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed. Unadjusted and adjusted survival estimates were determined.
resultsOverall, 1,547 patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 48 months. END did not have a statistically significant effect on 3-year survival (3-year: 69.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 67.2 to 72.6). Survival at 3-years among those not receiving END was 66.1% (95% CI: 62.7 to 69.5). Parotidectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy had the strongest effect on mortality. There was no difference in 3-year survival among patients who underwent parotidectomy and adjuvant radiation stratified by receipt of END nor did END have a statistically significant effect on survival in mucoepidermoid carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, high-risk histology, high T stage, or academic center treatment subgroups.
conclusionsEND did not have a statistically significant effect on survival among cN0 patients with high-grade parotid cancer when taking into account receipt of adjuvant therapy and confounding. The role of END on survival and locoregional control remains to be further elucidated in prospective studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:1487-1495, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.