Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468535›Full record

ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2019

S-100B as an extra selection tool for FDG PET/CT scanning in follow-up of AJCC stage III melanoma patients.

Eric A Deckers, Kevin P Wevers, Anneke C Muller Kobold, Samantha Damude, Otis M Vrielink, Robert J van Ginkel, Lukas B Been, Barbara L van Leeuwen, Harald J Hoekstra, Schelto Kruijff

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric A DeckersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-207X
Kevin P WeversDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Anneke C Muller KoboldDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Samantha DamudeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Otis M VrielinkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Robert J van GinkelDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Lukas B BeenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Barbara L van LeeuwenDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Harald J HoekstraDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Schelto KruijffDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesThis current study assessed the value of S-100B measurement to guide fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning for detecting recurrent disease in stage III melanoma patients.

methodsThis study included 100 stage III melanoma patients in follow-up after curative lymph node dissection. Follow-up visits included physical examination and S-100B monitoring. FDG PET/CT scanning was indicated by clinical symptoms and/or elevated S-100B.

resultsOf 100 patients, 13 (13%) had elevated S-100B without clinical symptoms, of whom 7 (54%) showed disease evidence upon FDG PET/CT scanning. Twenty-six patients (26%) had clinical symptoms with normal S-100B and FDG PET/CT revealed metastasis in 20 (77%). Three patients had clinical symptoms and elevated S-100B, and FDG PET/CT revealed metastasis in all three (100%). Overall, FDG PET/CT scanning revealed metastasis in 30 of the 42 patients (71.4%). For seven recurrences, elevated S-100B prompted early detection of asymptomatic disease; 10% of all asymptomatic patients in follow-up, 23% of all patients with recurrent disease.

conclusionS-100B cannot exclude recurrent disease during follow-up of stage III melanoma. However, adding S-100B measurement to standard clinical assessment can guide FDG PET/CT scanning for detecting recurrent melanoma.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitBiomarkers, TumorFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsS100B protein, humanS100 Calcium Binding Protein beta SubunitbiomarkerFDG PET/CTfollow-upmelanomarecurrenceS-100B

Identifiers

PMID31468535
PMCPMC6851671
OpenAlexW2970023987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.