Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468483›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2020

Microfluidic Device for Localized Electroporation.

Justin Brooks, Arian Jaberi, Ruiguo Yang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Justin BrooksDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Arian JaberiDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA.
Ruiguo YangDepartment of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE, USA. ryang@unl.edu.
University of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Targeted mass spectrometry approaches to understand CART processing and recepter interactionsP20GM113126 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN · PI RAZAVI RIZI, MOHAMMAD · 2016 to 2025
$20.8M
Nebraska Center for Nanomedicine- Pilot ProjectsP30GM127200 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI OUPICKY, DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$5.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113126NIGMS NIH HHS P30 GM127200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation is a common method of transfection due to its relatively low risk and high transfection efficiency. The most common method of electroporation is bulk electroporation which is easily performed on large quantities of cells yet results in variable levels of viability and transfection efficiency across the population. Localized electroporation is an alternative that can be administered on a similar scale but results in much more consistent with higher quality transfection and higher cell viability. This chapter discusses the creation and use of a simple and cost-effective device using porous membrane for performing localized electroporation.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorCell SurvivalElectroporationGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHeLa CellsHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesPlasmidsTransfectionGreen Fluorescent ProteinsCell transfectionLab-on-a-chipLocalized electroporationMicrofluidic

Identifiers

PMID31468483
PMCPMC9262042
OpenAlexW2970369561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.