ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2020
Imaging cognitive fatigability in multiple sclerosis: objective quantification of cerebral blood flow during a task of sustained attention using ASL perfusion fMRI.
Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perfusion Imaging of Fatigue and Time-on-Task Effects in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022Article
- Development of a behavioural intervention for cognitive fatigability in multiple sclerosis: Protocol for a pilot and feasibility study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Does Intensive Training of Attention Influence Cognitive Fatigability in Patients With Acquired Brain Injury?Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Validation of Discrete and Regression-Based Performance and Cognitive Fatigability Normative Data for the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test in Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Cognitive Fatigability Interventions in Neurological Conditions: A Systematic Review.Neurology and therapy · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive fatigability (CF) can be defined as an inability to maintain performance throughout a sustained cognitive task. Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are more susceptible to CF than healthy controls (HCs); however, the neural correlates underlying CF are still under investigation. Arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion imaging provides a non-invasive method of objectively quantifying cerebral blood flow (CBF) during sustained attention tasks. To date, no study has yet evaluated CF in MS using this methodology. 10 MS and 10 HCs completed a 20-min psychomotor vigilance task (PVT). CF was evaluated by dividing the PVT into quintiles and examining performance from the 1st to the last. Mean reaction times (RTs) and number of lapses were recorded. Global and regional CBF changes were evaluated throughout the PVT as well as during pre- and post-task rest. Increased susceptibility to CF was noted in the MS group. Distinct patterns of CBF activation were observed in areas comprising fronto-parietal, cortico-striatal, cerebellar, and basal ganglia regions; however, when and how these regions were engaged differed between the MS and HC groups. In particular, dysfunction in CBF to the middle frontal gyrus may underlie the CF effects observed. In addition, individuals with MS appear to struggle with "switching off" regions of the attentional network at rest following sustained cognitive effort. Findings support the use of ASL as an appropriate methodology for evaluating CF in MS with an overall pattern of attentional network dysfunction being observed. Objectively quantifying CF in this manner can help validate patients' subjective complaints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.