Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468358›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2020

Application of iPSC to Modelling of Respiratory Diseases.

Ben A Calvert, Amy L Ryan Firth

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genetic associations in sepsis and ARDS.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing Allows Generation of the Mouse Lung in a Rat.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Basic Science Perspective on Engineering and Modeling the Large Airways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Development and characterization of ferretFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2021
    Article
  17. Stem cells and lung regeneration.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ben A CalvertHastings Center for Pulmonary Research, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Amy L Ryan FirthHastings Center for Pulmonary Research, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. amy.firth@med.usc.edu.

Funding

Characterization of mechanisms regulating multiciliated cell specification using patient-specific induced pluripotent stem cells.R01HL139828 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI RYAN, AMY LEANNE · 2018 to 2022
$2.5M
Quantitative analysis of mucociliary clearance in airway ciliopathiesR01HL153622 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KANSO, EVA, RYAN, AMY LEANNE · 2021 to 2024
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139828NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL153622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Respiratory disease is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality world-wide with an increasing incidence as the aged population prevails. Many lung diseases are treated for symptomatic relief, with no cure available, indicating a critical need for novel therapeutic strategies. Such advances are hampered by a lack of understanding of how human lung pathologies initiate and progress. Research on human lung disease relies on the isolation of primary cells from explanted lungs or the use of immortalized cells, both are limited in their capacity to represent the genomic and phenotypic variability among the population. In an era where we are progressing toward precision medicine the use of patient specific induced pluripotent cells (iPSC) to generate models, where sufficient primary cells and tissues are scarce, has increased our capacity to understand human lung pathophysiology. Directed differentiation of iPSC toward lung presented the initial challenge to overcome in generating iPSC-derived lung epithelial cells. Since then major advances have been made in defining protocols to specify and isolate specific lung lineages, with the generation of airway spheroids and multi cellular organoids now possible. This technological advance has opened up our capacity for human lung research and prospects for autologous cell therapy. This chapter will focus on the application of iPSC to studying human lung disease.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyCell DifferentiationHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsOrganoidsRespiration DisordersDifferentiationHuman modelsiPSCLung diseaseNKX2.1Stem cell

Identifiers

PMID31468358
PMCPMC8274633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.