Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468349›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2019

A common vaginal microbiota composition among breeds of Bos taurus indicus (Gyr and Nellore).

Silvia Giannattasio-Ferraz, Mateus Laguardia-Nascimento, Marcela Ribeiro Gasparini, Laura Rabelo Leite, Flávio Marcos Gomes Araujo, Anna Christina de Matos Salim, André Penido de Oliveira, Jacques Robert Nicoli, Guilherme Corrêa de Oliveira, Flavio Guimarães da Fonseca and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Vaginal Microbiome Dynamics of Cows in Different Parities.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Silvia Giannattasio-FerrazDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Mateus Laguardia-NascimentoDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Marcela Ribeiro GaspariniDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Laura Rabelo LeiteCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Flávio Marcos Gomes AraujoCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Anna Christina de Matos SalimCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
André Penido de OliveiraEmpresa de Pesquisa Agropecuária de Minas Gerais - EPAMIG, Uberaba, MG, Brazil.
Jacques Robert NicoliDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Guilherme Corrêa de OliveiraCentro de Pesquisa René Rachou - FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Flavio Guimarães da FonsecaDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Edel Figueiredo Barbosa-StancioliDepartamento de Microbiologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. edelfb@icb.ufmg.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6584-4333

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 473879/2013-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Describing the bovine vaginal microbiota is essential to better understand its physiology and its impact on health maintenance. Despite the economic importance of reproduction of these animals, bovine vaginal microbial community is still poorly described in comparison with rumen microbiome. Previous studies of our group described the vaginal microbiota of Nellore, an important Bos taurus indicus breed, using metagenomics. In order to better understand this microbiota, the present work aims to investigate another important breed, Gyr. Results have shown bacterial dominance over Archaea and Fungi was observed, with the most abundant bacterial phylum (Firmicutes) representing 40-50% of bacterial population, followed by Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The Fungi kingdom had the Mycosphaerella genus as its main representative, followed by Cladosporium. Archaea were observed at a very low abundance in all animals, with a high relative abundance of Methanobrevibacter genus. These results demonstrate a high microbial diversity on vaginal tract of Gyr, as demonstrated for Nellore and different from the previously described for other species. Our results indicate a great similarity between vaginal microbiota of Nellore and Gyr despite the differences in animal handling and genetic improvement. As observed for both breeds, individual variation is the largest source of microbial diversity between animals.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaAnimalsArchaeaBacteriaBreedingCattleFemaleFungiMetagenomicsPhylogenyRumenVaginaBovineGyrMetagenomicsMicrobiotaVaginal tract

Identifiers

PMID31468349
PMCPMC6863323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.