Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468330›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2020

Combination of Surgical Technique and Bioresorbable Mesh Reinforcement of the Crural Repair Leads to Low Early Hernia Recurrence Rates with Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair.

Walaa F Abdelmoaty, Christy M Dunst, Filippo Filicori, Ahmed M Zihni, Daniel Davila-Bradley, Kevin M Reavis, Lee L Swanstrom, Steven R DeMeester

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06444347 (The Impact of Biosynthetic Mesh on Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Robotic Anti-Reflux Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06444347 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of Biosynthetic Mesh on Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Robotic Anti-Reflux Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2024 to 2030Enrolled200ConditionsHiatal HerniaArmsBiosynthetic Mesh, Hiatal Hernia Repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy and safety of mesh reinforced cruroplasty with Phasix™ ST vs. Bio-AHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of crural reinforcement with bio-aHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. One-year outcomes of biological mesh in hiatal hernia repair: a real-world study.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Walaa F AbdelmoatyThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Christy M DunstThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Filippo FilicoriThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Ahmed M ZihniThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Daniel Davila-BradleyThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Kevin M ReavisThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Lee L SwanstromThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA.
Steven R DeMeesterThe Oregon Clinic, 4805 NE Glisan St Suite 6N60, Portland, OR, 97213, USA. sdemeester@orclinic.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5480-8406

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLaparoscopic paraesophageal hernia (PEH) is associated with a low morbidity and mortality but an objective hernia recurrence rate in excess of 50% at 5 years. Biologic mesh has not been shown to reduce hernia recurrence rates. Recently, a new bioresorbable mesh made with poly-4-hydroxybutyrate with a Sepra-Technology coating on one side (Phasix-ST mesh) has become available. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of Phasix-ST mesh for reinforcement of the primary crural closure in patients undergoing elective, laparoscopic PEH repair.

methodsA prospective database was initiated and maintained for all patients undergoing PEH repair with the use of Phasix-ST mesh. We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive patients who had an elective, first-time laparoscopic PEH repair with Phasix-ST mesh and who completed their 1-year objective follow-up study. Patients having a reoperation, non-laparoscopic repair, or who failed to comply with the objective follow-up were excluded.

resultsTo achieve the desired 50 patients with 1-year objective follow-up, we reviewed the records of 90 consecutive PEH patients. In the final cohort of 50 patients, there were 32 females (64%) and 18 males. The median age of the patients at surgery was 67 years (range 44-84). The operation was PEH repair with fundoplication alone in 29 patients (58%) and PEH repair with Collis gastroplasty and fundoplication in 21 patients (42%). Phasix-ST mesh was used for crural reinforcement in all patients, and there were no intraoperative issues with the mesh or any difficulty placing or fixating the mesh at the hiatus. A diaphragm relaxing incision was performed in 2 patients (4%). The mean length of hospital stay was 2.8 days, and there was no major morbidity or mortality. On the 1-year objective follow-up study (median 12 months) a recurrent hernia was found in 4 patients (8%). No patient that had a Collis gastroplasty or a relaxing incision had a recurrent hernia. No patient had a reoperation. No patient had a mesh infection or mesh erosion.

conclusionsPhasix-ST mesh reinforcement of the crural closure during laparoscopic primary, elective PEH repair was associated with no adverse mesh-related events such as infection or erosion. Phasix-ST crural reinforcement in combination with tension-reduction techniques when necessary resulted in a very low (8%) objective hernia recurrence rate at a median follow-up of 1 year. These results demonstrate the safety of Phasix-ST mesh for use at the hiatus for crural reinforcement. This safety, along with the encouraging short-term efficacy for reducing hernia recurrence, should encourage further studies using the combination of resorbable biosynthetic mesh crural reinforcement and tension-reducing techniques during repair of paraesophageal hernias.

Indexed as

Hernia, HiatalLaparoscopyAbsorbable ImplantsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeFundoplicationHiatal herniaHiatusMeshParaesophageal hernia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.