Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468293›Full record

ArticleJournal of behavioral medicine2020

Dyadic coping mediates the effects of attachment on quality of life among couples facing ovarian cancer.

Cassandra J Crangle, Lindsey A Torbit, Sarah E Ferguson, Tae L Hart

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of behavioral medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Attachment in Couples Coping with Cancer: Associations with Observed Communication and Long-Term Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  10. The Role of Attachment and Dyadic Coping in Shaping Relational Intimacy: Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Emotional distress and coping strategies in COVID-19 anxiety.Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cassandra J CrangleRyerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B2K3, Canada.
Lindsey A TorbitRyerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B2K3, Canada.
Sarah E FergusonPrincess Margaret Hospital, 610 University Avenue, M700, Toronto, ON, M5G2M9, Canada.
Tae L HartRyerson University, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, ON, M5B2K3, Canada. tae.hart@psych.ryerson.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-5209-4059
Toronto Metropolitan University · CAPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is an interpersonal stressor affecting both patient and spouse. To examine the pathways that insecure adult attachment can impact health outcomes by way of dyadic processes, this cross-sectional study used the actor-partner interdependence mediation model to examine whether common dyadic coping (CDC) mediated the associations between attachment and quality of life (QOL). Couples (N = 106) facing ovarian cancer were recruited from a comprehensive cancer center and completed self-report questionnaires. Results indicated that worse social and functional QOL were associated with both one's own and one's partner's greater insecure attachment, by way of one's own use of less CDC. Unexpectedly, greater CDC reported by one's partner was associated with one's own lower functional QOL. Although CDC has beneficial effects on QOL, CDC may also be experienced as draining. Effects of adult attachment on dyadic coping are a significant contributor to subjective health outcomes among couples facing ovarian cancer.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsQuality of LifeSexual PartnersSpousesSurveys and QuestionnairesAttachmentCouplesDyadic copingOvarian cancerQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID31468293
OpenAlexW2970918876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.