ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2019
Modeling and simulation of the modified Rankin Scale and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale neurological endpoints in intracerebral hemorrhage.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a form of stroke characterized by uncontrolled bleeding into the parenchyma of the brain. There is no approved therapy for ICH and it is associated with very poor neurological outcomes with around half of subjects dying within 1 month and most subjects showing complete or partial disability. A key challenge is to identify subjects who could benefit from intervention using characteristics such as baseline hemorrhage volume and the increase in hemorrhage volume in the first few hours, which have been correlated with final outcomes in ICH. Combined longitudinal models were developed to describe stroke scales using categorical data (Modified Rankin Scale, mRS), continuous bounded data (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS), and time to death. Covariate effects for baseline hematoma volume and maximum increase in hematoma volume were incorporated to assess the improvement in outcome when hematoma volume increase would be reduced by a potential treatment. The combined model provided an adequate description of stroke scales, with patients split into a Non-survival and a High-survival sub-population, and dropout due to death was well described by a constant hazard survival model. Models were compared indicating that the combined mRS/NIHSS model provided the most information, followed by the NIHSS-only model, and the mRS-only model, and finally the traditional statistical analysis on dichotomized response at 90 days. Simulations showed that substantial reductions in hematoma volume increase were required to increase the probability of a favorable outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.