Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468181›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2019

PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning.

Jianan Cui, Kuang Gong, Ning Guo, Chenxi Wu, Xiaxia Meng, Kyungsang Kim, Kun Zheng, Zhifang Wu, Liping Fu, Baixuan Xu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET Image Reconstruction Using Deep Diffusion Image Prior.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. A Cross-modality Transformer Network for MR-guided Low-dose Tau PET Image Denoising.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Theranostics.Journal of nuclear medicine technology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. IE-CycleGAN: improved cycle consistent adversarial network for unpaired PET image enhancement.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Unified Noise-aware Network for Low-count PET Denoising with Varying Count Levels.IEEE transactions on radiation and plasma medical sciences · 2024
    Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jianan CuiCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kuang GongCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Ning GuoCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Chenxi WuCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Xiaxia MengCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kyungsang KimCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Kun ZhengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhifang WuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China.
Liping FuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Baixuan XuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhaohui ZhuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China.
Jiahe TianDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Huafeng LiuState Key Laboratory of Modern Optical Instrumentation, College of Optical Science and Engineering, Zhejiang University, 38 Zheda Road, No.3 Teaching Building, 405, Hangzhou, 310027, China. liuhf@zju.edu.cn.
Quanzheng LiCenter for Advanced Medical Computing and Analysis, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, White 427, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. Li.Quanzheng@mgh.harvard.edu.

Funding

Unified Joint Statistical Reconstruction of PET & MRP41EB022544 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Georges El Fakhri · 2017 to 2026
$14.8M
Study of Brain Spreading Pathways of Tau and Amyloid-Beta in (pre)clinical ADRF1AG052653 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LI, QUANZHENG, SEPULCRE, JORGE · 2017 to 2017
$1.4M
PROTON THERAPY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT CENTERC06CA059267 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GOITEIN, MICHAEL · 1992 to 1995
–
NCI NIH HHS C06 CA059267NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG052653NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB022544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeImage quality of positron emission tomography (PET) is limited by various physical degradation factors. Our study aims to perform PET image denoising by utilizing prior information from the same patient. The proposed method is based on unsupervised deep learning, where no training pairs are needed.

methodsIn this method, the prior high-quality image from the patient was employed as the network input and the noisy PET image itself was treated as the training label. Constrained by the network structure and the prior image input, the network was trained to learn the intrinsic structure information from the noisy image and output a restored PET image. To validate the performance of the proposed method, a computer simulation study based on the BrainWeb phantom was first performed. A

resultsFor the simulation study, contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) vs. standard deviation (STD) curves showed that the proposed method achieved the best performance regarding the bias-variance tradeoff. For the clinical PET/CT dataset, the proposed method achieved the highest CNR improvement ratio (53.35% ± 21.78%), compared with the Gaussian (12.64% ± 6.15%, P = 0.002), NLM guided by CT (24.35% ± 16.30%, P = 0.002), BM4D (38.31% ± 20.26%, P = 0.002), and Deep Decoder (41.67% ± 22.28%, P = 0.002) methods. For the clinical PET/MR dataset, the CNR improvement ratio of the proposed method achieved 46.80% ± 25.23%, higher than the Gaussian (18.16% ± 10.02%, P < 0.0001), NLM guided by MR (25.36% ± 19.48%, P < 0.0001), BM4D (37.02% ± 21.38%, P < 0.0001), and Deep Decoder (30.03% ± 20.64%, P < 0.0001) methods. Restored images for all the datasets demonstrate that the proposed method can effectively smooth out the noise while recovering image details.

conclusionThe proposed unsupervised deep learning framework provides excellent image restoration effects, outperforming the Gaussian, NLM methods, BM4D, and Deep Decoder methods.

Indexed as

Deep LearningPositron-Emission TomographySignal-To-Noise RatioUnsupervised Machine LearningAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingQuality ControlAnatomical priorDeep neural networkDenoisingPosition emission tomographyUnsupervised deep learning

Identifiers

PMID31468181
PMCPMC7814987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.