SynthesisSurgery today2020
Management of isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence of colorectal cancer.
Synthesis in Surgery today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Treatment with curative intent for locoregional recurrent colon cancer - a systematic review.BMC surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of radical lymphadenectomy in colorectal cancer with para-aortic lymph node metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC surgery · 2022Pooled it
- Does surgical intervention contribute to survival for patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer?Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2025Article
- Focusing on chylous ascites: a noteworthy complication after laparoscopic/robotic para-aortic lymphadenectomy in left-sided colorectal cancer in a high-volume single center.Techniques in coloproctology · 2025Article
- Surgical Resection of a Solitary Metachronous Retrocaval Lymph Node Metastasis above the Renal Vein from Rectal Cancer.Surgical case reports · 2025Article
- Management of Surgically Accessible Lymph Nodes Beyond Normal Resection Planes.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Colorectal Cancer with Lymph Node Metastasis: A Systematic Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- Review
- The treatment strategy of R0 resection in colorectal cancer with synchronous para-aortic lymph node metastasis.World journal of surgical oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence (PALNR) after curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and its optimal management is not defined clearly. This review investigates the best outcomes among published studies on the management of PALNR in the field of CRC. We searched the PubMed database for studies reporting on the management of isolated PALNR in CRC, published in English or Japanese from January, 2000 to December, 2018. Studies including patients with other metastases were excluded. A total of 24 retrospective studies including 227 patients with PALNR were evaluated. The 3-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 60 to 100%, with a median OS of 34-80 months for patients who underwent PALNR dissection, and 14-42 months for patients who received non-surgical treatment. No surgery-related mortality was reported and the incidence of surgical, mainly low-grade, complications ranged from 33 to 52%. The predictors of improved survival outcome included R0 resection margins. Dissection for PALNR from CRC is considered a feasible treatment option that may yield a better prognosis than non-surgical treatment alone. Preoperative chemotherapy or CRT should be considered for their potential benefits, including a reduction in cancer volume and improved R0 resection rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31468151What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.