Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468131›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2020

Management of pelvic fracture urethral injuries in the developing world.

Pankaj M Joshi, Sanjay B Kulkarni

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Management of pelvic fracture urethral injury.Translational andrology and urology · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Burden of Plastic Surgery in Rural Kenya: The Kapsowar Hospital Experience.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genitourinary reconstruction.World journal of urology · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. "Primary" bulbar urethral ischemic necrosis following pelvic fracture urethral injury: A rare surgical challenge.Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pankaj M JoshiKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India. drpankajmjoshi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2233-7785
Sanjay B KulkarniKulkarni Reconstructive Urology Center, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic fracture causes urethral injury in about 10% of patients. The etiology of injury is different in developing and developed world. While high-velocity automobile accidents are common in developed countries, where patients are in the car and there is usually a side impact, in the developing world, significant number of injuries are caused by two-wheeler accidents, pedestrians, farming accidents, fall from height, fall from tractor, fall from tree, and other causes like earthquake. We share our experience which is the largest in the reported literature. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn our tertiary referral center, we get referrals from all across the globe. Since 1995 till 2018 we have performed 1307 surgeries for Pelvic fracture urethral injury. Our referrals are for complex urethroplasty. Our data from 1995-2018 was analyzed. Data after June 2018 was not included so as to have a minimum follow up of 6 months.

results1296 patients were males and 11 were females. In the group of 1296 males, mean age was 32.4 years (range 1-79 years). The minimum follow-up was 6 months, and the median follow-up was 56.7 months (range 6.2-233.7). The overall success rate was 88.79% for primary cases while re-do urethroplasty patients had a success rate of 83.70%. The majority of our patients (more than 61.40%) needed inferior pubectomy: Of the total 1307 cases of urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injury data was available for 1042 patients. Data were available for 1042 patients. The data from 2012 onwards were prospectively analyzed while the previous data were retrospectively analyzed.

conclusionPFUI are common in the developing world. They tend to be more complex and have longer gaps as compared to developed world. This could be related to the anthropometric differences between races as well as nature of injury. They are best managed with delayed transperineal repair with excellent outcomes. Ancillary maneuvers are more frequently required. Re-do urethroplasty can achieve good results.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDeveloping CountriesFemaleFractures, BoneHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedPelvic BonesRetrospective StudiesUrethraUrologic Surgical ProceduresAnastomotic urethroplastyPelvic fracturePFUDDPFUI

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.