Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468086›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2019

[Contrast medium-induced renal failure : Useful protective measures prior to contrast medium administration].

J Wiora, R Westenfeld

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

J WioraKlinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
R WestenfeldKlinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und Angiologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. ralf.westenfeld@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIodinated contrast is essential for diagnosis and treatment in contemporary interventional cardiology. An important complication of percutaneous intervention is contrast-induced nephropathy, which is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, while prolonged hospitalization is responsible for economic consequences.

objectivesThis article reviews the definition of contrast-induced nephropathy, the role of biomarkers in early diagnosis to identify high-risk patients and potential therapeutic options for preventing acute nephropathy. CURRENT DATA: The optimization of patients' circulating volume remains the main aspect for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy, as recent studies confirm. Several medications are known to be nephrotoxic, whereas several are nephroprotective and the subject of recent research.

conclusionInterventions to improve outcomes of established acute kidney injury have not been developed as yet. Prevention and early diagnosis are relevant factors in clinical management. It is important to identify patients at risk and to treat them preemptively.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryBiomarkersContrast MediaHumansPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRisk FactorsBiomarkersContrast MediaAcute kidney injuryBiomarkersContrast agentPercutaneous coronary interventionPreventionRisk factors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.