ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019
[Immune checkpoint inhibition in Merkel cell carcinoma].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Local tumor control of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in a 90-year-old woman].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2021Article
- The treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma with immune checkpoint inhibitors: implications for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2021Article
- Surgical Therapy of Merkel Cell Carcinoma-Single Centre Experience of 157 Patients in Germany.Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMerkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare but aggressive form of skin cancer in which Merkel cell polyomavirus infection and chronic exposure to ultraviolet radiation are key risk factors. Immune checkpoint inhibition has revolutionized the treatment of locally advanced, inoperable and metastatic MCC.
aimTo outline the modern management of MCC based on advances in our understanding of MCC tumour biology and the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors, namely inhibitors of programmed cell death protein (PD)-1- and PD‑1 ligand 1 (PD-L1).
methodsA review of the scientific literature listed in PubMed.
resultsFirst line therapy with the PD-L1 blocking antibody avelumab is associated with a response rate of 62%. In the second line setting, for example after chemotherapy, the response rate only reaches 33%. However, in patients who responded in the second line setting, 69% remained relapse free after 2 years. Treatment responses occurred on average after 6.1 weeks of therapy. First line treatment with pembrolizumab (anti-PD‑1 antibody) is associated with a 2-year survival rate of 69% and the median survival rate has not been reached. Whilst the various chemotherapy regimens are associated with similar response rates, these are typically short lived. DISCUSSION: Checkpoint inhibition offers an effective treatment option for patients with MCC. Avelumab is currently licensed as a treatment for metastatic disease. Chemotherapy remains an option to reduce tumor load, or in the context of resistance and/or contraindications to immune checkpoint therapy. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant use of checkpoint inhibition in MCC may represent a future treatment strategy pending the results of on-going clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.