ReviewDer Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete2019
[Atypical fibroxanthoma and pleomorphic dermal sarcoma].
Review in Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Painful tumor with pretibial ulceration on the right lower leg].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atypical fibroxanthoma (AFX) or undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is a rare malignant neoplastic disease of the skin. At the beginning of the 1960s AFX was described as an independent entity and superficial variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH). Since then, many controversies on the classification have arisen mainly because in many cases dedifferentiated neoplasms from other origins were falsely diagnosed as AFX. A relevant deep expansion, the invasion of nerves and vessels or the presence of tumor necrosis are described as being typical for UPS; however, in the first-line they represent risk factors for recurrence. In view of the clinical and histological features it is meaningful to consider AFX and UPS as one disease. In recent years many studies on the molecular pathological background have attempted to make a better classification of the neoplasm, without being able to so far name a certain specific histopathological or molecular pathological characteristic. The AFX/UPS is still in essence a morphological and immunohistochemical diagnosis by exclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.