Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468067›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Association between anticholinergic (atropinic) drug exposure and cognitive function in longitudinal studies among individuals over 50 years old: a systematic review.

Laurine Andre, Adeline Gallini, François Montastruc, Jean-Louis Montastruc, Antoine Piau, Maryse Lapeyre-Mestre, Virginie Gardette

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association between anticholinergic burden and dementia in UK Biobank.Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurine AndreUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France. andre.l@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7559-8014
Adeline GalliniUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
François MontastrucUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Jean-Louis MontastrucUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Antoine PiauGérontopôle de Toulouse, Institut du Vieillissement, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Maryse Lapeyre-MestreUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.
Virginie GardetteUMR INSERM 1027, Université de Toulouse, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Toulouse (CHU Toulouse), Toulouse, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWith increasing age, adults are often exposed to anticholinergic drugs and are prone to potential adverse drug reaction, among which cognitive impairment. If the short-term cognitive effects of anticholinergic drugs are well established, their long-term cognitive effects have less been studied.

objectiveTo provide a systematic review of longitudinal studies which assessed the effect of anticholinergic exposure on cognition in individuals over 50 years. MATERIALS: We searched the MEDLINE database for studies with a minimal 6-month follow-up, assessing anticholinergic exposure through a biological measure or a clinical list and reporting at least one cognitive outcome. We used the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and additional criteria regarding the anticholinergic exposure to assess studies' methodological quality. Given the heterogeneity of the studies, we performed a systematic review.

resultsAmong the 1574 references retrieved, 25 studies were included. Anticholinergic medications were mostly defined through the Anticholinergic Cognitive Burden Scale (n = 14/25). Six studies evaluated baseline drug collection, 14 used longitudinal aggregated measure, and 5 multiple drug exposure measures over time. Seventeen studies assessed anticholinergic burden. Cognitive function was assessed by mild cognitive impairment/dementia incidence (n = 15) or neuropsychological tests (n = 14). Most studies were of poor quality and retrieved discordant results. However, studies with good quality (n = 4) suggested a relationship between anticholinergic drug exposure and/or burden and cognitive function.

conclusionOur review suggests a deleterious effect of anticholinergic exposure on mid/long-term cognitive function but should be confirmed in studies with improved methodology. Meanwhile, prescription of anticholinergic drugs should remain cautious.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsCholinergic AntagonistsCognitionCognition DisordersCognitive DysfunctionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedCholinergic AntagonistsAnticholinergic burdenAnticholinergic drug exposureCognitive declineLongitudinal studySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.