Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31468060›Full record

ReviewCellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS2020

Placental mesenchymal stromal cells as an alternative tool for therapeutic angiogenesis.

Suja Ann Mathew, Charuta Naik, Paul A Cahill, Ramesh R Bhonde

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The mechanisms of exosomes in diabetic foot ulcers healing: a detailed review.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Mesenchymal stromal/stem cells and bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Suja Ann MathewSchool of Regenerative Medicine, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, MAHE, Allalasandra, Near Royal Orchid, Yellahanka, Bangalore, 560 065, India. suja.ann@manipal.edu.
Charuta NaikSchool of Regenerative Medicine, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, MAHE, Allalasandra, Near Royal Orchid, Yellahanka, Bangalore, 560 065, India.
Paul A CahillSchool of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science and Health, Dublin City University, Glasnevin Dublin 9, Ireland.
Ramesh R BhondeDr. D.Y. Patil Vidyapeeth (DPU), Pimpri, Pune, 411018, India. ramesh.bhonde@dpu.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysregulation of angiogenesis is a phenomenon observed in several disorders such as diabetic foot, critical limb ischemia and myocardial infarction. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) possess angiogenic potential and have recently emerged as a powerful tool for cell therapy to promote angiogenesis. Although bone marrow-derived MSCs are the primary cell of choice, obtaining them has become a challenge. The placenta has become a popular alternative as it is a highly vascular organ, easily available and ethically more favorable with a rich supply of MSCs. Comparatively, placenta-derived MSCs (PMSCs) are clinically promising due to their proliferative, migratory, clonogenic and immunomodulatory properties. PMSCs release a plethora of cytokines and chemokines key to angiogenic signaling and facilitate the possibility of delivering PMSC-derived exosomes as a targeted therapy to promote angiogenesis. However, there still remains the challenge of heterogeneity in the isolated populations, questions on the maternal or fetal origin of these cells and the diversity in previously reported isolation and culture conditions. Nonetheless, the growing rate of clinical trials using PMSCs clearly indicates a shift in favor of PMSCs. The overall aim of the review is to highlight the importance of this rather poorly understood cell type and emphasize the need for further investigations into their angiogenic potential as an alternative source for therapeutic angiogenesis.

Indexed as

AnimalsExosomesFemaleHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsNeovascularization, PhysiologicPlacentaPregnancyCell based therapyClinical trialsConditioned mediaDifferentiation potentialExosomesHypoxiaImmunomodulationIschemiaPlacental mesenchymal stem cellsPregnancyRegenerative medicineSecretomeStem cellsVasculatureWound healing

Identifiers

PMID31468060
PMCPMC11104823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.